Search Results for "defence civilian employees"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "defence civilian employees"

35 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 35 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Former Railway Employee Against Kerala State Electricity Board in Weightage Benefit Dispute — Railway Service Held to Be Central Government Service for Pensionary Weightage. Board's Own Orders and Settlements Recognizing Former Government Service for Weightage Are Binding, and Recovery from Retired Employee Without Misrepresentation Is Impermissible.

1 Jan 2026

The appellant, Bency John, joined the Indian Railways as a Junior Draftsman on 9th August 1990 and rendered over ten years of regular pensionable serv...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences in Service Matter — Retirement Age Enhancement Not Applicable to Autonomous Body Employees. The Court held that the Cabinet decision to enhance superannuation age to 65 years for AYUSH doctors was limited to those directly under the Ministry of AYUSH and CGHS, and did not extend to employees of autonomous bodies like CCRAS.

1 Jan 2023

The case involves an appeal by the Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences (CCRAS) and its Director General against the judgment of the Ori...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition Challenging OROP Policy Implementation for Ex-Servicemen. Periodic Revision Every Five Years Upheld as Not Arbitrary Under Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India.

16 Mar 2022

The dispute arose from a petition under Article 32 of the Constitution challenging the implementation of the One Rank One Pension (OROP) policy for ex...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Employer in Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme Dispute Over Application Date. The Court set aside the Delhi High Court's direction to apply the MACP scheme from 01-01-2006, holding that the scheme's effective date of 01-09-2008 under the office memorandum dated 19-05-2009 was valid, and employees not completing 24 years of service by that date were not entitled to benefits under the superseded ACP scheme.

8 Mar 2022

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of appeals concerning the applicability date of the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACP) introduced b...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Government's Implementation of Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme from 2008 in Service Law Dispute. The Court held that MACPS is an incentive scheme distinct from earlier pay structures, and the government's policy decision to implement it from 01.09.2008 rather than 01.01.2006 is justified and not arbitrary.

28 Apr 2021

The dispute centered on the effective date for implementation of the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACPS) for civilian employees of the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Order on Regularisation of Temporary Employees in Ordnance Factory. The Court upheld the CAT's direction to consider regularisation of employees who completed 240 days of work in a year, applying the principle of equal pay for equal work under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

12 Feb 2020

The petitioners, Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Defence, the D.G.O.F/Chairman of the Ordnance Factory Board, and the General Manage...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal Against Grade Pay Parity for Army Officer in MES. Army Officer Cannot Claim Equal Grade Pay with Civilian Counterparts as IDSE Rules Exclude Tenure Appointments and Military Personnel Form a Distinct Class.

16 Jan 2020

The appeal was filed by the Union of India against the judgment of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Kolkata, which directed the Appellants t...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Multiple Writ Petitions Filed by Union of India Challenging Central Administrative Tribunal Orders in Service Matters. The Petitions Involve Defence Civilian Employees and Orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal.

16 Nov 2016

The provided judgment text is limited to the case title and party names. No substantive content regarding the facts, issues, arguments, or decision of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Profession Tax on Defence Civilians — Amendment Excluding Them from Exemption Upheld as Constitutional. The court held that the classification between Armed Forces personnel and civilian employees under Section 27A(a) of the Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Traders, Callings and Employment Act, 1975 is based on an intelligible differentia and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

7 Jul 2006

The petitioners, civilian employees working in the Defence Department of the Union of India, filed writ petitions challenging the action of the State ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Death Sentence of 26/11 Terrorist in Mumbai Attacks Case. Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal of Co-Accused Due to Insufficient Evidence, Finding No Perversity in Trial Court's Decision.

1 Jan 1970

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals arising from the 26/11 Mumbai terror attacks. The appellant, Mohammed Ajmal Kasab, a Pakistani national, was conv...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)