Search Results for "deduction under Section 10(1)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "deduction under Section 10(1)"

117 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 117 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Claimants' Appeal in Railway Accident Case, Enhances Compensation for Death of Anil Jindal. Negligence of Railway Administration Established as Train Hit Deceased at Unmanned Level Crossing Without Warning.

9 Jul 2026

The case arises from a railway accident at an unmanned level crossing in Jalna, where a train hit a vehicle driven by Anil Jindal, resulting in his de...

High Court

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation for Airport Land Acquisition in Marol Village — Market Value Fixed at Rs. 90 per sq. m. for 1981 and 1982 Notifications. Court Relies on Expert Valuer's Report and Rejects SLAO's Low Valuation Based on Inadequate Comparable Sales.

11 Dec 2024

The judgment pertains to two Land Acquisition References (LAR No.18 of 1988 and LAR No.19 of 1988) filed by A.H. Wadia Charity Trust (the Claimant) se...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

25 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Full and True Disclosure — Petitioner Had Disclosed All Material Facts in Return of Income. The court held that the reopening was based on a change of opinion and was invalid as the Assessing Officer did not form a reasonable belief of escapement of income.

7 Aug 2023

The petitioner, Astec LifeSciences Ltd., is engaged in the business of manufacturing and trading of agrochemicals and pharmaceutical intermediates. Wi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Review and Rectification Orders in MVAT Case Due to Lack of Jurisdiction and Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioner's claim for deduction under Rule 58 of MVAT Rules for works contract was wrongly rejected by review order passed beyond limitation period and without proper hearing.

3 Aug 2023

The petitioner, Kalpataru Power Transmission Ltd., challenged a review order dated 8th March 2021 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax under...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Cooperative Credit Society Tax Deduction Case — Society Not a Cooperative Bank Despite Non-Member Transactions. Primary Cooperative Credit Society remains eligible for deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of Income Tax Act, 1961 even if it accepts deposits from and lends to non-members, as it is not a cooperative bank under Section 5(ccv) of Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

7 May 2021

The case involves four tax appeals filed by the Revenue (Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Goa) against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tri...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State's Revision Petitions in Agricultural Income Tax Cases — Limitation Period for Revision Under Section 55(1) of KAIT Act Runs from Date of Service of Order. The court held that the word 'passed' in Section 55(1) must be read as 'served' to give effect to the right of revision, and the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal has power to condone delay under Section 32(5)(a) of the Act.

25 Mar 2014

The case involves a batch of civil revision petitions filed by the State of Karnataka under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State's Revision Petitions in Agricultural Income Tax Reassessment Cases — Reassessment Notices Issued Beyond Limitation Period Invalid. The court held that reassessment proceedings under Section 35 of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957 must be initiated within the prescribed limitation period, and failure to do so renders the notice invalid.

25 Mar 2014

The case involves multiple civil revision petitions filed by the State of Karnataka against orders of the Karnataka Appellate Tribunal allowing appeal...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State's Revision Petitions in Agricultural Income Tax Cases — Limitation Period for Revision Under Section 55(1) of KAIT Act, 1957 Is 4 Years and Cannot Be Extended. The court held that Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 is not applicable to revision petitions under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957, and the revisional authority has no power to condone delay beyond the prescribed period of 4 years.

25 Mar 2014

The case involves a batch of civil revision petitions filed by the State of Karnataka under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State's Revision Petitions in Agricultural Income Tax Reassessment Cases — Reassessment Notices Barred by Limitation. The court held that the Tribunal's finding on limitation is a question of fact not open to revision under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957.

25 Mar 2014

The State of Karnataka filed multiple revision petitions under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957 (KAIT Act) against ord...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)