Search Results for "declaration void"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "declaration void"

2598 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2598 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal on Court Fees Computation for Counter Claim in Property Suit — Directs Computation on Appellants' Share Only. Court fees under Section 6(iv)(ha) of Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 to be computed on value of property only to extent of appellants' share in counter claim seeking declaration that agreement to assign is void.

15 Oct 2013

The appeal arose from an order of the learned Single Judge dated 1 April 2013 on a Chamber Summons taken out by the appellants to set aside an order o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Declaration under Income Declaration Scheme, 2016. The court quashed reassessment and prosecution notices under Section 276CC of Income Tax Act, 1961, holding that valid declaration under the Scheme grants immunity.

8 Mar 2019

The petitioners, Umesh D. Ganore and Mangesh D. Ganore, filed two writ petitions challenging the decision of the Revenue Authority in not accepting th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State Appeal in Court Fee Matter — Declaration Suit Not Attracting Ad Valorem Fee Under Section 7(iv-A) U.P. Amendment. Decree for Mere Declaration of Title Is Not a 'Decree for Money or Other Property' and a Decree Ad Invitum Is Not an 'Instrument Securing Money or Other Property' Under the Court Fees Act, 1870, as Amended by U.P. Legislature.

26 Sep 1969

The dispute originated from a property inheritance matter. One Radhey Lal had filed Suit No. 4 of 1950 in the court of the Civil Judge, Jaunpur, claim...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute Over Sham Sale Deed — Suit for Declaration Without Seeking Cancellation of Sale Deed Held Maintainable Under Section 31 of Specific Relief Act, 1963. The Court held that a suit for declaration that a sale deed is sham and nominal does not require cancellation under Section 31 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, as the plaintiff only seeks to declare the true nature of the document.

8 Feb 2011

The appellant-defendant challenged the concurrent findings of the trial court and first appellate court in a suit filed by the respondent-plaintiff. T...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Trial Court's Valuation of Suit for Declaration and Injunction Under Karnataka Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act, 1958 — Suit for Declaration That Sale Deed Is Null and Void Is Properly Valued Under Section 26(c) Read with Section 24(d) of the Act.

24 Apr 2015

The defendant filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 30.7.2013 passed by the I Addit...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Application for Rejection of Plaint in Suit Alleging Unauthorized Alienation of Joint Family Property by Father. Limitation Period Under Section 109 of Limitation Act, 1963 Raised as Defence.

17 Oct 2025

The matter arises from an Interim Application filed by Defendant No.1, Mantri Building Condominium, seeking rejection of the plaint under Order VII Ru...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Declaring Marriage Null and Void Due to Lack of Consent and Fraudulent Registration. The court held that the appellant's consistent denial of marriage and evidence of fraudulent registration established lack of consent, rendering the marriage void ab initio.

29 Nov 2012

The appellant, a woman, filed a petition in the Family Court at Mumbai seeking a declaration that she was not the legally wedded wife of the responden...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Court Fee Order in Declaration Suit — Sale Deed Void Not Sought. Section 6(iv)(ha) of Bombay Court Fees Act applies only when declaration that sale is void is sought, not when declaration that sale is not binding on plaintiff is sought.

14 Jun 2017

The applicant, Common Piru Caudhari, filed a civil suit in the court of Civil Judge, JD, Malegaon seeking declarations that certain sale deeds dated 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Declares Payments Made by Company in Liquidation Void Under Section 536(2) of Companies Act, 1956 and Orders Refund. Payments made after winding up order to caterer without court approval are void, and the caterer must repay with interest.

14 Jan 2020

The Official Liquidator of M/s. GOL Offshore Limited (in liquidation) filed OLR No. 139 of 2018 under Section 536(2) of the Companies Act, 1956, seeki...

High Court

Bombay High Court Declares Assignment of Assets by Ex-Director Void Under Sections 536(2) and 537(1)(b) of Companies Act, 1956 — Post-Winding Up Sale Without Court Leave Invalid. The court held that any disposition of company property after winding up without court approval is void, and subrogation does not permit sale of assets without leave of the court.

21 Oct 2015

The judgment concerns two reports filed by the Official Liquidator seeking a declaration that a Deed of Assignment dated 14.03.2012 executed by Mr. Sh...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)