Search Results for "convenience fee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "convenience fee"

657 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 657 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Decides Writ Petitions Challenging Entertainment Duty on Online Booking Convenience Fees. The Court considered whether service charges exceeding Rs.10 per ticket form part of 'payment for admission' under Section 2(b) of Maharashtra Entertainments Duty Act, 1923.

6 Aug 2025

The writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an amendment to the Maharashtra ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Decrees Suit in Favour of Financial Advisor in Commercial Summary Suit for Professional Fees — Interpretation of Mandate Letter Options for Success Fee on Cash Sales of NPAs. Court holds that where the Bank exercised option of 100% cash sales, the Financial Advisor is entitled to success fee at the higher rate of 0.50% on cash received, as per option (a) of the Mandate Letter dated 1 July 2017.

25 Feb 2025

The Plaintiff, Special Situation Advisors (India) Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in providing financial adviso...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Validity of Government Orders Prohibiting Convenience Fees on Online Cinema Ticket Booking in Writ Petitions. Petitioners Challenged State's Prohibition of Additional Service Charges Under Article 19(1)(g) and Maharashtra Entertainment Duty Act, 1923, Asserting No Statutory or Executive Power to Regulate Private Contract Consideration.

10 Jul 2025

These writ petitions arose from a challenge to two Government Orders issued by the Revenue and Forests Department, Government of Maharashtra, which pr...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Ministerial Order Reversing Market Fee Demand Under APMC Act. Imported Edible Oil Transaction Raises Questions of Agency and Marketing Under Section 31 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Development and Regulation) Act, 1963.

20 Jul 2015

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by the Mumbai Agricultural Produce Market Committee against the order of th...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Addresses Court Fees in Motor Vehicle Accident Appeals Under Maharashtra Court Fees Act. Claimants Who Are Neither Insurer nor Owner Contend They May Restrict Appeal Valuation and Pay Only Half Ad Valorem Court Fees; Taxing Officer Demands Full Fee on Enhanced Claim Difference.

7 Aug 2025

The dispute arose from office objections requiring deficit court fees from appellants who filed appeals against awards of Motor Accident Claims Tribun...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision Declaring Licence Fees Ultra Vires under U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916. Imposition of Rs. 30/- and Rs. 51/- Licence Fees on Rickshaw Owners and Drivers Lacked Sufficient Quid Pro Quo, Rendering Bye-Laws Invalid.

4 Mar 1968

The dispute arose from bye-laws framed by the Nagar Mahapalika, Varanasi (Municipal Board) under the U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916, imposing annual li...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Financier's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Hire-Purchase Repossession — Held That Financier Is Not a 'Service Provider' Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986 for Repossession of Vehicle on Default. The court ruled that repossession of a vehicle under a hire-purchase agreement after default is a contractual right and not a deficiency in service.

1 Jan 2019

The appeal arose from a consumer dispute where the respondent, Rajesh Kumar Tiwari, had entered into a hire-purchase agreement with the appellant, M/s...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Planning Authority in Fee Revision Dispute — Revised Charges for Infrastructure and Premium FSI Upheld. The Court held that liability to pay charges arises at the time of grant of planning permission, not at the date of application, and authority can revise demands based on revised rates prevailing on the date of permission.

29 Jul 2019

The case involves a dispute between the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) and Prestige Estates Project Ltd. regarding the revision of ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Civil Revision Petition and Quashes Trial Court Order Accepting Deficit Court Fee After Two-Year Delay. Trial Court Erred in Exercising Discretion Under Section 149 CPC Without Proper Application of Mind and Beyond Statutory Time Limits Under Section 148 CPC, Rendering Suit Stillborn.

18 Feb 2026

The dispute arose from a civil revision petition filed by defendants challenging the Trial Court's order accepting deficit court fee payment after two...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dharwad Bench Hears Writ Petition by Concessionaire Challenging NOC for Access to Retail Outlet on BOT Highway. Key Legal Question is Whether Concessionaire’s Statutory and Contractual Rights to Control Access Override Highway Administration’s Power to Grant Access Permissions Under Section 8A of National Highways Act, 1956.

24 Oct 2017

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by Nandi Highway Developers Ltd (the concessionaire) challenging a no-objection certificate (NOC) dated 2...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)