Search Results for "contradictory awards"

103 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 103 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Section 34 Petitions Challenging Conflicting Stock Exchange Arbitral Awards. Court Focuses on Whether Same Arbitrator's Contradictory Findings on Identical Facts Vitiated Awards Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Three petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 were heard together by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute Over Unreturned Shares. Concurrent findings of arbitral tribunals that stock broker failed to return client's shares and dividends upheld under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Manoj Javeri Stock Broking Pvt. Ltd., a member of the Bombay Stock Exchange, challenged an arbitral award and appellate award dated 17...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute. Court Upholds Arbitral Tribunal's Findings of Fact and Rejects Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns multiple arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral awa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Television Production Dispute — Rejects Claim for Loss of Reputation. Court upholds arbitral tribunal's finding that claimant failed to prove loss of reputation due to alleged breach of contract.

The petitioners, Star India Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Madras Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Upholding Setting Aside of Arbitral Award for Perversity. Single Judge Correctly Found That Award Granting Damages for Loss of Business and Non-Supply Ignored Exclusion Clause and Lacked Evidentiary Basis.

The appeal arose from a dispute between a construction and engineering company (appellant) and an elevator manufacturer (first respondent) regarding c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL's Application to Declare Arbitral Award Satisfied as Vexatious and Dilatory. Unilateral Deposit of Disputed Amount Without Decree-Holder's Consent Does Not Discharge Judgment-Debtor Under Section 31 CPC.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), the unsuccessful respondent in an ar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench Resolves Conflict on Advance Increment for Best Teacher Awardees: Deletion of Clause 12 of Government Circular dated 12.12.2000 by Circular dated 04.09.2018 is Prospective, Entitlement Determined by Date of Selection/Recommendation, Not Actual Receipt of Award.

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad was constituted to resolve a conflict between two Division Bench decisions regarding the entitle...