Search Results for "compulsory purchase order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "compulsory purchase order"

390 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 390 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Compulsory Purchase of Property Under Chapter XXC of Income Tax Act — Delay in Passing Order Does Not Invalidate Acquisition. The period of two months under Section 269UD(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for passing an order for compulsory purchase is directory, not mandatory, and the order passed after 16 years was upheld.

30 Jul 2013

The petitioners, Satish Balan, Ratish Balan, Janki Balan, and Adarsh Sehtty, entered into an agreement for purchase of a property admeasuring 555 sq. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preemptive Purchase Orders Under Chapter XXC of Income Tax Act — Difference in Valuation Below 15% Threshold. The Appropriate Authority's orders under section 269UD(1) were set aside as the difference between fair market value and apparent consideration was less than 15%, and no opportunity of hearing was given.

23 Dec 2011

The petitioners, Pandharinath Bhikaji Telge and Dattaram Bhikaji Telge, were owners of a property in Chembur, Mumbai. They entered into an agreement t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit Challenging Compulsory Purchase Order Under Income Tax Act. Suit Seeking Declaration That Compulsory Purchase Order Stood Abrogated Was Barred by Section 269-UN and Section 293 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, Which Exclude Civil Court Jurisdiction.

25 Apr 2025

The appeal was filed against the order dated 7th April 2014 passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing the plaintiff's suit ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Pre-emptive Purchase Order Under Income Tax Act for Undervalued Property. Appropriate Authority's Valuation Based on Comparable Sales Upheld as Reasonable.

29 Jul 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by prospective buyers (Krishna Kumar Rawat & Ors.) and partly allowed the appeal by the Union of India against a H...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Arbitral Award in Land Acquisition Case — Board Cannot Return Acquired Land Without Government Sanction. Agreement to Release Land After Possession Taken Held Void as Board Lacks Power to Divest Title Under Section 24(2) of Delhi Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1998.

15 Jan 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Delhi Agricultural Marketing Board against the judgment of the Delhi High Court which had upheld an ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal, Upholds Constitutional Validity of Land Ceiling Provisions; Compensation at Fifteen Times Fair Rent Not Violative as Original Law Never Operative.

15 Jul 1969

The State of Orissa appealed against the Orissa High Court judgment that declared Chapter IV of the Orissa Land Reforms (Amendment) Act 13 of 1965 unc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Compulsory Retirement of Railway Employee for Unauthorized Occupation of Railway Land. Petitioner Failed to Prove Title or Permission for Construction, Leading to Dismissal of Writ Petition.

22 Aug 2006

The petitioner, B.S. Rath, joined Western Railway as an Apprentice on 15th February 1965 and later became a Senior Motorman. He was charged with unaut...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes BDA's Cancellation of Site Allotment for Violation of Natural Justice — Purchaser from Original Allottee Not Given Hearing Before Termination. The court held that the cancellation order was passed without affording an opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice, and directed the BDA to hear the petitioner before passing any fresh order.

8 Dec 2017

The petitioner, Sri Manjunath Shetty, purchased site No.196/B in HSR Layout, Bangalore, from the original allottee. The Bangalore Development Authorit...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Tenants' Challenge to Land Acquisition for Street Widening; Upholds Municipal Corporation's Power Under Sections 52 and 114 of Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925. Tenants Could Not Challenge Acquisition Where Landowners Gave Undertaking Not to Claim Compensation for Temporary Structures Built After Section 4 Notification Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

19 Feb 1968

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals filed by tenants challenging the compulsory acquisition of land by the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation for widenin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Declaration of Lapsed Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act for Failure to Acquire Land Within Statutory Period. Purchase Notice Served Under Section 127(1) of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Not Followed by Acquisition Within Two Years, Resulting in Deemed Lapsing of Reservation.

27 Jan 2022

The petitioner, Shree Vinayak Builders & Developers, owned land admeasuring 6377.12 Sq.Mts. in Nagpur, which was reserved for a 24-meter wide DP Road ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)