Search Results for "competent authority order"

9971 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 9971 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal in Senior Citizens Act Case Upholding Order of Maintenance for Elderly Father. Appeal by Son Against Competent Authority’s Order of Maintenance Not Maintainable as Only Aggrieved Senior Citizen Can Appeal Under Section 16(1) of the Act.

The dispute arose under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, involving an elderly father, aged 72, and his son. The f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Summons Issued Under Section 126 BNSS for Non-Compliance with Procedural Safeguards. The Court Holds That Executive Magistrate Must First Pass Order Under Section 130 BNSS Before Issuing Summons.

The writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka challenged the summons dated 30.09.2025 issued by the Executive Magistrate (Respondent No.3) unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Dismisses Writ Petition Against Karnataka Administrative Tribunal Order Upholding Lokayukta Enquiry. Court Holds That Challenge to Entrustment of Departmental Enquiry is Premature and Petitioner Can Raise All Contentions After Enquiry Concludes.

The dispute arose from an illegal construction on a civic amenity site under the Mullamari Irrigation Project. In 2007, Smt. Mahananda, an allottee, b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Challenge by Drug Supplier Against Blacklisting Order Alleging Non-Compliance with Rule 26A of Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurements Rules, 2000. Petitioner Assails Blacklisting as Ultra Vires in Absence of Corrupt Practice Finding and Procedural Violation.

The petitioner, a pharmaceutical company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karna...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Application of Mind. Detenu's Past Conduct and Single Incident Insufficient to Justify Preventive Detention Under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

The petitioner, Chandrakala w/o Ramlal Jadhav, challenged the detention order dated 07.12.2020 passed by the District Collector, Jalna (respondent No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated as Statements of Co-Accused Not Furnished.

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Burhan Fakhruddin Khatumdi, challenged a detention order dated 27.3.2015 passed by the Principal Secretar...