Search Results for "common purposes"

4729 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4729 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds Sections 74 and 75(1) of Tamil Nadu Cooperative Societies Act, 1983 and Common Cadre Service Rules for Cooperative Societies. The Court held that the impugned provisions and rules are constitutionally valid and do not violate Article 19(1)(c) or Article 43B of the Constitution.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the constitutional validity of Sections 74 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Writ Petition; Holds Common Election Petition Maintainable Under Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958. Rejection of Nominations of School Teachers for Not Obtaining Management Permission Held Illegal Following Supreme Court Precedent.

The dispute arose from elections to Gram Panchayat Nawargaon, Taluq Sindewahi, District Chandrapur, held on 22 August 2010. The Gram Panchayat consist...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Arguments on Constitutional Validity of Shivraj Fine Art Litho Works (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertaking) Act, 1984 — Matter Remains Undecided in Provided Text. Petitioner Contended Act Lacked Nexus with Directive Principles and Was Not Protected Under Article 31C.

The petitioners, M/s Shivraj Fine Art Litho Works, a partnership firm, challenged the constitutional validity of the Shivraj Fine Art Litho Works (Acq...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Constitutionality of Prohibitory Orders Under Section 144 CrPC Restricting Public Assembly. Judgment Clarifies That Reasonable Restrictions on Speech and Assembly Must Be Just, Fair and Reasonable Under Articles 19 and 21.

The Supreme Court initiated a suo motu criminal writ petition regarding the incident at Ramlila Maidan on 4-5 June 2011, involving the imposition of p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Determines True Interpretation of Common Plots Conveyance in Favor of Co-owner Societies. The expression 'tenants in common' in the conveyance indicates absolute co-ownership, not a lease, and MHADA retains no title.

The plaintiff, Vithalnagar Society Ltd, a co-operative housing society, filed an Originating Summons seeking determination of the true interpretation ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Injunction Against Developer in MOFA Dispute Over Common Areas and Parking Rights. Developer restrained from constructing on open space and selling car parks as they are common facilities under Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963.

The dispute arises from a development project known as Phoenix Towers in Parel, Mumbai. The appellants, Phoenix Construction Company and another, are ...