Search Results for "cash refund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Issues Notice in Service Matter Challenging Deletion of Names ...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals Against Ex Parte Interim Injunction in Pr...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Private Complaint Case — T...

Search Results for "cash refund"

235 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 235 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds SEBI Order Against Corporate Giant in Futures Manipulation Case. The Court held that cornering 93.63% open interest through agents and dumping shares to depress settlement price constituted fraud under PFUTP Regulations.

29 May 2026

The case involves appeals by Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) against orders of the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) which upheld SEBI's findings ...

High Court

High Court Quashes Tax Refund Adjustment Order for Violation of Settlement Scheme and Natural Justice. Adjustment of refund for one tax period against demand for another under proviso to Section 50(1) of Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 held invalid when petitioner had applied under Maharashtra Settlement of Arrears of Tax, Interest, Penalty or Late Fees Act, 2023 and no defect notice was issued.

12 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a proprietorship concern registered under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 challenging a settlement order dated 18 April...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Higher Interest on Refund of Seized Cash in GST Investigation — Circular on Pre-deposit Interest Not Applicable to Seized Amounts. Court held that interest on refund of cash seized during investigation should be at the rate actually earned on fixed deposit or 18% per annum, whichever is higher, to prevent unjust enrichment.

20 Sep 2024

The case involves two writ petitions filed by Ramkaran Karwa and his son Samir Karwa against the Union of India and other GST authorities. The petitio...

High Court

High Court Quashes GST Appellate Order Against Indian Oil Corporation for Violation of Natural Justice — Pre-deposit Requirement Set Aside. Failure to Provide Personal Hearing and Reasoned Order Renders Appellate Order Unsustainable Under Section 107(11) of CGST Act, 2017.

20 Aug 2024

The petitioner, M/s Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., a public sector undertaking engaged in storage and supply of petroleum products, filed a writ petitio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Terminal Excise Duty Refund Dispute Under Foreign Trade Policy. Export Oriented Units Not Entitled to Refund as Procurement from Domestic Tariff Area Units Was Ab Initio Exempt from Excise Duty Under Paragraphs 6.2(b) and 6.11(c)(ii) of Foreign Trade Policy, 2009-2014.

4 Jan 2022

The dispute involved appeals by Export Oriented Units (EOUs) challenging the refusal of refund claims for Terminal Excise Duty (TED) paid on excisable...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Full Refund for Flights Cancelled During COVID-19 Lockdown — Office Memorandum Discriminating Between Pre-Lockdown and Lockdown Bookings Held Invalid. Airlines Must Refund Full Fare Without Cancellation Charges for All Cancelled Flights, and Credit Shell Cannot Be Imposed Unilaterally.

1 Oct 2020

The judgment arises from a batch of writ petitions filed in the Supreme Court of India challenging the refusal of airlines to refund the full amount f...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in Excise Incentive Withdrawal Case — Policy Change Upheld as Prospective and in Public Interest. The Court held that the impugned notification was not retrospective and promissory estoppel did not bar the government from modifying the incentive scheme for Kutch industries.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the Union of India against the common judgment of the Gujarat High Court, which had quashed Notificatio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Cash Refund of CENVAT Credit Under Section 11B(2) Proviso (c) When Credit Cannot Be Utilized Due to Exempted Final Products. The court held that clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B(2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 permits cash refund of credit on inputs where the assessee is unable to utilize such credit, overruling the contrary view in Commissioner of Central Excise vs. Jain Vanguard Polybutylene Ltd.

14 Jun 2019

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to resolve a conflict regarding the interpretation of clause (c) to the proviso of section 11B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Conviction in Dacoity Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. The court held that the testimony of a single witness (PW8) without corroboration and unreliable identification cannot sustain a conviction under Section 395 IPC.

27 Apr 2016

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Bombay, in Sessions Case No.1505/99. The appel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeal on Limitation Issue — Show Cause Notice Held Time-Barred. The relevant date for computing limitation under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962 for recovery of duty in case of provisional assessment is the date of refund order or refund cheque, not the date of credit into government treasury.

1 Mar 2006

The appellant, M/s Gujarat Alkalies & Chemicals Limited, filed an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against the order of the Customs, ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)