Search Results for "cane jaggery"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "cane jaggery"

11 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State's Levy of Sales Tax on Cane Jaggery While Exempting Palm Jaggery Under Madras Act. Classification Upheld as Cane and Palm Jaggery Are Commercially Different and Tax Does Not Violate Article 14 or 301.

17 Jul 1969

The appellants, dealers in cane jaggery in Tamil Nadu, challenged the levy of sales tax on cane jaggery while palm jaggery remained exempt, under the ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Sugar Cane Reservation Dispute — Upholds Single Judge's Order Quashing Government Notification. Court holds that notification under Section 21 of the Karnataka Sugar Cane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1961 must be based on actual production capacity and not on installed capacity.

21 Nov 2025

The case involves a dispute over the reservation of cane supply area under the Karnataka Sugar Cane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1961. The...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Non-Speaking Order in Sugar Industry Licensing Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice and Previous Court Direction. Order passed without considering objections and contrary to earlier writ court direction to hear petitioners before granting licence to third party.

6 Jan 2023

The petitioners, M/s. Askins Biofuels Private Limited and M/s. Shri Bhramanandasagar Jaggery Industries, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Non-Speaking Order in Sugar Industry Licensing Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice and Binding Precedent. Order of Commissioner for Cane Development set aside for being contrary to earlier court direction and lacking reasons.

6 Jan 2023

The petitioners, M/S. Askins Biofuels Private Limited and M/S. Shri. Bhramanandasagar Jaggery Industries, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Denial of NOC for Sugar Mill — No Legal Right to NOC Under Sugarcane Control Order. The court held that the Sugarcane (Control) Order, 1966 does not confer a right to obtain a No Objection Certificate for setting up a sugar mill, and the Commissioner's refusal based on existing capacity was valid.

31 Mar 2023

The appellants, M/s Askins Biofuels Private Limited and M/s Shri Bharmanandasagar Jaggery Industries, filed a writ appeal against the order of a learn...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Sugar Export Ban — No Fundamental Right to Export Sugar. The Court held that the Central Government's power under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 to prohibit sugar exports is a valid regulatory measure and does not violate Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

21 Sep 2023

The petitioners, M/S Askins Biofuels Private Limited and M/S Shri Bhramanandasagar Jaggery Industries, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 22...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Exemption for Warehousing of Tea as Agricultural Produce under GST. Tea stored in 50 kg bags after standard processing is 'agricultural produce' eligible for exemption under Notification No. 12/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.

11 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Nutan Warehousing Company Pvt. Ltd., is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in the business of warehousing, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Election of Directors in Cooperative Sugar Factory, Upholds Validity of Bye-law 26(2) and Rejects Disqualification Claims. The court held that the election process was valid and the petitioners failed to establish any disqualification under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed by Ashok Pundlikrao Patil, Gokul Vishvanathrao Shinde, and Khandu Maroti Umbare, challenging the e...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Outraging Modesty Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Intent. Conviction under Section 354 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Intent to Outrage Modesty Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

20 Apr 2011

The appellant, Sanjay Madhavrao Suryawanshi, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nilanga in Sessions Case No. 10 of 2000 for offences unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Tax on Medical Reimbursement Above Rs.15,000 as Perquisite Under Section 17(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Medical reimbursement exceeding Rs.15,000 per annum treated as taxable perquisite is not arbitrary or discriminatory and does not violate Articles 14 or 21 of the Constitution.

13 Nov 2006

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by bank employees' associations and an individual officer challenging the constitutional validity of ...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)