Search Results for "bogus tenancies"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "bogus tenancies"

20 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 20 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Revision Against Eviction Decrees on Grounds of Unauthorized Subletting, Bonafide Requirement, and Default in Rent Payment. Concurrent findings of fact by lower courts on unauthorized subletting, bonafide requirement, and default under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 were upheld as no jurisdictional error was found.

11 Oct 2024

The dispute pertains to eviction proceedings initiated by the landlord-respondent against the tenant-petitioners in respect of a shop premises in Kolh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Rent Controller's Permission to Evict Tenant for Arrears of Rent but Rejects Habitual Defaulter Ground. Landlord's claim for habitual default fails due to lack of specific pleading and proof under clause 13(3)(ii) of C.P. & Berar Rent Control Order, 1949.

6 Nov 2006

The case involves two writ petitions arising from proceedings under the C.P. & Berar Rent Control Order, 1949. The landlord, Ganesh Tukaram Lonkar, so...

High Court

High Court Rules on Unlawful Subletting: Transfer of Tenancy Disguised as Business Sale Invalid. Court highlights the misuse of tenancy rights and emphasizes protection of landlords under Bombay Rent Act.

7 Oct 2024

The Bombay High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, legal heirs, in a long-standing eviction dispute regarding unlawful subletting of commercial p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tahsildar's Order Cancelling Mutation Entries in Tenancy Land Dispute — Exceeds Jurisdiction Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Tahsildar Cannot Cancel Certificate Issued Under Section 38(E) of Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1950, as Such Power Lies Only with Revenue Tribunal or Civil Court.

16 Oct 2025

The petitioners, legal heirs of tenants Ganpati Kundlik Kurule and Abaji Ramji Jadhav, challenged the order dated 04.09.2025 passed by the Tahsildar, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tahsildar's Order Cancelling Mutation Entries in Tenancy Land Dispute — Held That Tahsildar Lacks Jurisdiction to Cancel Certificate Issued Under Section 38(E) of Hyderabad Tenancy Act After 65 Years Without Notice to Affected Parties. The court held that the certificate under Section 38(E) of the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1950 attains finality and cannot be cancelled by the Tahsildar after such a long lapse of time, and the order was passed in violation of natural justice.

16 Oct 2025

The petitioners, legal heirs of original tenants Ganpati Kundlik Kurule and Abaji Ramji Jadhav, challenged the order dated 04.09.2025 passed by the Ta...

High Court

High Court Permits Official Liquidator to Break Open Lock and Take Physical Possession of Company Premises Despite Collusive Tenancy Decrees Obtained After Winding Up Without Leave Under Section 446 Companies Act, 1956. The court held that decrees obtained without leave under Section 446 are void and the Official Liquidator is entitled to possession.

30 Aug 2019

The Official Liquidator filed a report seeking permission to break open the lock put by the ex-management of J.B. Diamonds Limited (in liquidation) an...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging MHADA NOC for Reconstruction — Neighboring Society Failed to Prove Fraud or Infringement of Rights. NOC under DCR 33(7) for reconstruction of cessed building was valid as FSI of 2.5 did not depend on number of tenements and allegations of bogus tenancies were disputed questions of fact not suitable for writ jurisdiction.

28 Jun 2006

The dispute arose from a writ petition under Article 226 filed by a neighbouring cooperative housing society and its member challenging a No Objection...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Appellate Officer's Order Under Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Act. The Judgment Text Is Truncated and Does Not Contain the Court's Final Disposition or Legal Findings.

6 Nov 2019

The Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board, a unit of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA), filed a series of eigh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Entry Mutation Based on Fraudulent Document - Petitioner's Title Upheld Over Respondent's Bogus Claim. Mutation of revenue records does not confer title; revenue authorities cannot decide title in summary proceedings under Section 149 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

6 May 2016

The petitioner, Karansing Kachrusing Kakas, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad, which confirmed th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint in Development Dispute — Plaintiff Allowed to Bring on Record Subsequent Events Including Deed of Conveyance and Alleged Fraudulent Tenancy. Court holds that pre-trial amendments should be liberally allowed to determine real controversy between parties.

27 Sep 2024

The plaintiff, M/s SR Enterprises, filed a Commercial Suit against defendants Gurbachan Kaur Jattinder Singh Chadha and another, arising out of a Deve...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)