Search Results for "belated witness statement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "belated witness statement"

432 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 432 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Quashes Sessions Court Order Allowing Prosecution Witness Under Section 311 CrPC. Prosecution Failed to Show Strong and Valid Reasons as the Witness's Evidence Would Merely Corroborate the Complainant and Was Sought at a Belated Stage.

28 Sep 2021

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay dealt with a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, filed by the accus...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Re-examination of Witness Under Section 311 CrPC in Murder Case — Petitioner Granted Opportunity to Cross-Examine Key Witness on New Facts. The court held that the trial court erred in rejecting the application solely on delay without considering the necessity of evidence for just decision.

2 Aug 2017

The petitioner, original accused No. 2 in Sessions Case No. 69/2015 pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, was facing prosecution for ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Defendant's Application to Produce Additional Documents in Suit by NTPC — Belated Filing After Cross-Examination Concluded and Multiple Prior Opportunities Not Availed. The court held that the defendant's conduct indicated a desire to delay the trial and that permitting the documents would cause prejudice to the plaintiff under Order 11 Rule 1 and Order 13 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

29 Jan 2016

The judgment concerns a Chamber Summons filed by the defendant, Reliance Industries Ltd. (RIL), in a suit pending since 2006 filed by the plaintiff, N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as evidence of sole eyewitness was inconsistent and uncorroborated.

5 Mar 2010

The case involves an appeal against conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC for murder. The prosecution case relied heavily on the testimony of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Additional Affidavit in Cheque Dishonour Case — Rejects Hyper-Technical Approach. The court held that when documents are already permitted to be produced, an application to file an additional affidavit to prove them should be allowed to ensure a fair trial under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

7 Apr 2010

The petitioner, M/s. Jagdale Mirch Masala Products (India), filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order of the Judicial Magistrate First Class...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Erroneous Disbelief of Eyewitness — Negligence of Car Driver Established. The court restored the Tribunal's award of Rs. 16,08,000 with interest, holding that the High Court's rejection of the eyewitness was conjectural and that the accident was caused by the car driver's rash and negligent driving.

1 Jan 2020

The case arises from a motor accident on 25.03.2009 near Ghazipur, Uttar Pradesh, where a car driven by Sanjeev Kapoor collided with a truck. Sandeep ...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, hears criminal appeal against conviction for murder and cruelty under the Indian Penal Code. The case involves examination of two dying declarations and allegations of dowry demand and harassment leading to death.

21 Sep 2015

The case arises from the death of Kanopatra, a married woman who succumbed to burn injuries on 29 November 2008. Her husband Sunil (accused no.1), his...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Additional Documents in Civil Suit — Belated Filing to Fill Lacuna Not Permitted. Trial court's discretion to reject application for producing resolution and letter of authority during cross-examination upheld as no justifiable cause shown.

11 Jan 2016

The petitioners, M/s. BGC International Pvt. Ltd. and Mr. Balaji Pothraj, were defendants in Special Civil Suit No. 22/2007/A filed by the respondents...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Application to Call Witness Under Section 311 Cr.P.C. — Application Filed at Final Arguments Stage After Defence Evidence Closed, Held Not Permissible as It Would Cause Prejudice and Delay.

22 Apr 2014

The petitioners, original accused in Sessions Case No.12/2013 pending before the Sessions Judge, faced trial for offences punishable under Sections 36...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Permitting Recall and Reopening of Evidence in Civil Suit Due to Impermissible Filling of Lacunae. Recalling Witness Under Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC Cannot Be Used to Adduce Additional Evidence After Deletion of Rule 17A, Especially When Prior Admissions Exist.

4 Aug 2026

The dispute arose from a civil suit filed in 2010 seeking declaration of ownership and permanent injunction over certain properties. The appellant, de...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)