Search Results for "banking ombudsman"

27 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 27 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Cyber Fraud Case — Directs Bank to Refund Rs. 76.9 Lakhs Under RBI Circular. Unauthorized Addition of Beneficiaries and Absence of OTP Constitute Deficiency in Service Under RBI Circular Dated 6 July 2017.

The petitioners, a director and a closely held family company, maintained a bank account with Respondent No. 2 for 15-20 years. On 1 October 2022, unk...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Banking Ombudsman Order in Demand Draft Cancellation Dispute. Petitioner Entitled to Cancellation of DD and Credit of Amount with Interest as RBI Circulars Permit Cancellation After Three Months and Complaint Was Within Limitation.

The petitioner, Doddaballapur Spinning Mills, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, held a current account with ICICI Bank Ltd. (respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Banking Ombudsman Award for Wrongful Debit Despite Stop Payment Instructions. Bank's Liability Upheld as Limitation Period Under Banking Ombudsman Scheme 1995 is Directory, Not Mandatory.

The case involves a dispute between Canara Bank (the petitioner) and Shri Uttam Rathod (respondent no.1), a proprietor of M/s. Rishi Impex, who held a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Banking Ombudsman Order in Demand Draft Cancellation Dispute. Petitioner Entitled to Cancellation of DD and Credit of Amount with Interest as Per RBI Circulars.

The petitioner, Doddaballapur Spinning Mills, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, held a current account with ICICI Bank Ltd. (respond...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Banking Ombudsman Dispute Over Counterfeit Drafts. Limitation Act Does Not Apply to Proceedings Under Banking Ombudsman Scheme, 2002.

The petitioner, Bank of Baroda, challenged an arbitral award passed by the Banking Ombudsman (respondent no.2) in favor of respondent no.1, Vijaya Ban...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Rule Nisi in Cyber Fraud Case Involving Unauthorized Withdrawals of Rs. 38.04 Lakh. Petitioner Claims Banks Breached RBI Guidelines on Internet Banking and Failed to Reverse Fraudulent Transactions.

The petitioner, a freelancer in business consultancy, maintained savings and current accounts with HDFC Bank since 2011 and 2016 respectively. On 14 J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Against Bank Forfeiture — Directs Refund of Rs.24.10 Lakhs Deposit with Interest. Forfeiture of deposit without contractual authority in auction sale is arbitrary and unjust, warranting refund with interest at 6% per annum.

The petitioner, P Balaji Babu, participated in an auction conducted by the State Bank of India (respondent No.1) for the sale of immovable property ow...