Search Results for "alternate suitable premises"

127 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 127 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Rent Control Suit — Confirms Findings of Subletting and Non-User of Premises. Landlord's Eviction Suit Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Upheld as Tenants Failed to Prove Bona Fide Use and Consent for Subletting.

The case arises from a landlord-tenant dispute concerning Shop No.2 and rear portion of Shop No.1 in Supariwala Mansion, Parel, Mumbai. The original p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Rent Control Case — Bonafide Requirement of Landlord Upheld. Tenant's Claim of Availability of Alternate Premises Rejected as Landlord Cannot Be Compelled to Use Residential Premises for Commercial Purpose Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the defendant-tenant (Parshuram Chunilal Kanojiya) challenging the eviction decree passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Upholds Rent Control Act, Denying Britannia’s Claim for Market Rent

The fixation of standard rent for an upscale apartment in Mumbai, which was rented to Maya Sunil Alagh, the wife of Britannia's former Managing Direct...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Summary Eviction Order Against 80-Year-Old Tenant in MHADA Redevelopment Dispute. Petitioner's Right to Alternate Accommodation Under Section 95A of MHADA Act Upheld as Board Failed to Provide Permanent Rehabilitation Before Eviction.

The petitioner, Sugrabai Gulam Abas Tambawala, an 80-year-old housewife, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Eviction Suit — Landlord Failed to Prove Bona Fide Need for Residential Premises Under Section 16 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Tenant's Use of Rear Rooms for Storage and Occasional Stay Did Not Constitute Subletting or Change of User.

The petitioner, a tenant, challenged the judgment and order dated 11th August 1999 passed by the Additional District Judge, Thane, which partly decree...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree Against Tenant for Change of User from Residential to Commercial. Tenant's Use of Premises for Storing Cloth Packages and Business Constitutes Change of User Under Rent Control Legislation.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the original defendants (tenants) challenging the judgment and decree of the lower Appellate C...