Search Results for "additional fee"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "additional fee"

1898 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1898 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Challenge Against Excessive Enrolment Fees by State Bar Councils — Additional Fees Beyond Section 24(1)(f) of Advocates Act Held Unconstitutional. The Court ruled that SBCs cannot impose any extra charges at enrolment, as the statutory fee is exhaustive and any additional levy violates Articles 14 and 19(1)(g).

30 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court in this judgment addressed a challenge under Article 32 of the Constitution against the enrolment fees charged by State Bar Councils...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 234E of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Levy of Fee for Late Filing of TDS Returns is Valid. The Court held that the fee under Section 234E is compensatory in nature and not a penalty, and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

9 Feb 2015

The petitioners, a practising Chartered Accountant and others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Decrees Suit in Favour of Financial Advisor in Commercial Summary Suit for Professional Fees — Interpretation of Mandate Letter Options for Success Fee on Cash Sales of NPAs. Court holds that where the Bank exercised option of 100% cash sales, the Financial Advisor is entitled to success fee at the higher rate of 0.50% on cash received, as per option (a) of the Mandate Letter dated 1 July 2017.

25 Feb 2025

The Plaintiff, Special Situation Advisors (India) Pvt. Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in providing financial adviso...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision Declaring Licence Fees Ultra Vires under U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916. Imposition of Rs. 30/- and Rs. 51/- Licence Fees on Rickshaw Owners and Drivers Lacked Sufficient Quid Pro Quo, Rendering Bye-Laws Invalid.

4 Mar 1968

The dispute arose from bye-laws framed by the Nagar Mahapalika, Varanasi (Municipal Board) under the U.P. Municipalities Act, 1916, imposing annual li...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Revenue Appeals in Service Tax on Airport Development Fee Case. User Development Fee Collected by Airport Operators Under Statutory Authority is Not Subject to Service Tax Under Finance Act, 1994.

19 May 2023

The Supreme Court considered appeals by the revenue against CESTAT orders that had held user development fee collected by airport operators not liable...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeals in Income Tax Dispute Over Disallowance of Fees and Taxes Under Section 40(a)(iib) of Income-tax Act, 1961. The Court upheld the High Court's finding that gallonage fee, licence fee, and shop rental for FL9 licences were disallowable as exclusive levies on a State Government undertaking, while those for FL1 licences were not exclusive, and surcharge on sales tax and turnover tax were not fees or charges under Section 40(a)(iib) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

3 Jan 2022

The appeals arose from a common judgment of the High Court of Kerala in income tax matters involving Kerala State Beverages Manufacturing & Marketing ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Part Regarding Penalty Calculation for Unauthorized Admissions in Technical Education. Penalty must be based on actual fees collected, not sanctioned fees, under Government Resolution dated 22.01.2007.

16 Jul 2020

The petitioners, Sinhgad Technical Education Society and Sau Venutai Chavan Polytechnic, Pune, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Court Fee on Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Payable Under Article 4 of Schedule I of Maharashtra Court Fees Act. Appeal is a memorandum of appeal, not an application, thus ad valorem fee applies.

25 Apr 2016

The appellant filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an order dated 28.08.2015 passed under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Premium on Staircase and Lift Areas Under D.C. Regulations — Levy at Revised Land Rate Upheld. The court held that the Municipal Corporation can charge premium for exempted FSI areas at the prevailing land rate, and the petitioners have no vested right to the earlier rate.

10 Jun 2010

The petitioners, M/s. Buildarch and its partner, owned a property at Prabhadevi, Mumbai, and sought to redevelop it. They submitted plans and paid var...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Court Fee on Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Payable Under Article 4 of Schedule I of Maharashtra Court Fees Act. Appeal from order under Section 34 is treated as appeal from decree, requiring ad valorem court fee on subject matter value.

25 Apr 2016

The appellant, Rishabhkumar Jejani, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an order dated 28.08.2...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)