CIVIL APPEAL NO. 4905 OF 2022
1 Jan 1970The present civil appeal arose under Section 15Z of the Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992 challenging the order dated 19.04.2022 passed...
Search Results for "WTM"
17 result(s) found
Found 17 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Application for Restoration of Writ Petition in SEBI Matter — No Case Made Out for Review or Recall of Final Order. Court holds that an interim application seeking restoration of a disposed writ petition is not maintainable when the main petition was disposed of by consent and no grounds for review or recall exist under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC or inherent powers.
22 Dec 2023The Bombay High Court dismissed an interim application filed by the original petitioners (minority shareholders of Bharat Nidhi Ltd. - BNL) seeking re...
- 47
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds SEBI Order Against Corporate Giant in Futures Manipulation Case. The Court held that cornering 93.63% open interest through agents and dumping shares to depress settlement price constituted fraud under PFUTP Regulations.
29 May 2026The case involves appeals by Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) against orders of the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) which upheld SEBI's findings ...
- 348
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows SEBI's Appeal Against Securities Appellate Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Penalties for Fraudulent Diversion of Funds. The Court Held That Immediate Diversion of Preferential Allotment Proceeds from Disclosed Objects Constitutes Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Under SEBI PFUTP Regulations, 2003, and Ratification Cannot Cure Such Violations.
17 Mar 2026The dispute arose from Securities and Exchange Board of India's (SEBI) action against Terrascope Ventures Limited (formerly Moryo Industries Limited) ...
- 807
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds SEBI's Order Against Kotak Mutual Fund for Violating SEBI Circular on Side Pocketing of Debt Securities. The Court held that the creation of segregated portfolios without complying with the mandatory conditions of the SEBI circular dated 28th December 2018 was impermissible, and the fund managers and trustees were liable for the resulting losses.
13 Jul 2026The case involves appeals by Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company Limited (Kotak AMC), Kotak Mahindra Trustee Company Limited, and several senior e...
- 144
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to RERA Refund Order Alleged Void for Want of Jurisdiction. The Petition Tests Whether Supreme Court's Newtech Decision Renders Final Unappealed RERA Orders Non-Est Under Section 71 of RERA Act.
7 Apr 2026The writ petition came before the Bombay High Court raising the issue whether an order passed by the RERA Adjudicating Officer directing refund of Rs....
- 28
High Court
High Court of Bombay Hears Petition to Quash Criminal Proceedings Based on SEBI Consent Order. The Court Reviews the Effect of Consent Order under Sections 11 and 11B of the SEBI Act on Pending Trial for Offences under Indian Penal Code and Prevention of Corruption Act.
14 Nov 2025The petitioner, an accused in two criminal cases arising from alleged illegalities in the Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) of Yes Bank Limited and Infr...
- 28
High Court
Bombay High Court Commercial Division Considers Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award Imposing Liability on Depository for Broker's Actions. The petition challenges the award's finding that CDSL must indemnify investor for breach by its depository participant despite the broker's misuse of power of attorney.
1 Dec 2025Background: The petition pertains to a challenge under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against an arbitral award that held th...
- 27
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals by Sahara Companies on SEBI's Regulatory Powers Over OFCDs. Case centers on Section 55A(b) Companies Act and compliance with DIP Guidelines for issuance of optionally fully convertible debentures.
1 Aug 2026The case involved two Sahara Group companies, Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited ...
- 112
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Depository Against Arbitral Award for Lost Shares Due to Third-Party Fraud. Court Holds That Depository Not Liable Absent Negligence or Breach of Contract Under Section 12(1-A) of SEBI Act, 1992.
2 Jul 2026The case involves an appeal by Central Depository Services (India) Ltd. (CDSL) against a judgment of a learned Single Judge dated 01/12/2025, which up...
- 140
