Search Results for "Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Rules"

212 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 212 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Employer's Appeal Against Labour Court Order Holding Fresh Application Maintainable. Interpretation of Rule 16 of U.P. Industrial Disputes Rules, 1957 Concludes That Dismissal for Default Is Not Permissible; Labour Court Must Proceed to Decide on Merits.

The dispute originated from a claim by workmen of Agra Electric Supply Co. Ltd. for recovery of the cost of uniforms not supplied during the period 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench Reviews Industrial Court's Finding of Unfair Labour Practice Against Employer for Denying Permanent Status to Temporary Workers. Court Examines Whether Completion of 240 Days of Continuous Service Under Model Standing Orders Mandates Confirmation.

This batch of writ petitions was filed by Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. and one employee before the Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, challenging a common...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Writ Petitions in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints Against Hospital. The Court held that the Industrial Court correctly declined jurisdiction when the employer-employee relationship was disputed due to contract labour claims, following Supreme Court precedents.

The litigation arose out of writ petitions filed by a group of workers (Aayas and Ward Boys) challenging the Industrial Court's dismissal of their com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petitions Challenging Dismissal of Workman and Tribunal's Order in Industrial Dispute; Outcome Not Specified

The workman, employed as an Accountant since 1995 and later promoted, was an active union member. On 25.11.2013, a strike notice under Section 22(1)(B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Workmen. Employer Failed to Prove Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and Workmen Had Completed 240 Days of Service.

The petitioner, Raymond UCO Denim Private Ltd., challenged the order dated 1.1.2009 passed by the Industrial Court, Yavatmal in ULP Complaint No.27 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 5634 OF 2014

Three writ petitions were filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by a group of workers, including Aayas and Ward Boys, challenging the c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recognition of Trade Union Under Section 11 of MRTU & PULP Act. Membership Verification Based on Employer's Records Upheld as Proper.

The petitioner, Bharatiya Kamgar Sena, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, challenged an order of the Industrial Court declarin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Addresses Writ Petitions Challenging Dismissal and CGIT Order in BEL Strike Case. Allegations of Abusive Conduct and Obstruction During Strike Result in Dismissal Under Certified Standing Orders.

The workman, formerly an Accountant at Bharat Electronics Limited, was dismissed from service following a strike on 11 December 2013. He joined the co...