Search Results for "Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976"

161 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 161 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears State's Appeal on Classification of Bid Lands Under Agricultural and Urban Land Ceiling Laws. The core issue is whether Bid lands of former princes are agricultural lands subject to ceiling under the Gujarat Agricultural Lands Ceiling Act, 1960 or excluded under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976.

1 Aug 2026

The State of Gujarat and the Mamlatdar filed a civil appeal in the Supreme Court against the judgment of the High Court of Gujarat which had set aside...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Possession Not Validly Taken Under Section 10(6) of ULC Act, 1976. Act of Court Should Not Injure Suitor; Repeal of ULC Act in 2008 Vests Land in Appellant.

3 Mar 2025

The appellant, M/S A.P. Electrical Equipment Corporation (now ECE Industries Limited), owned land in Fatehnagar Village, Rangareddy District, Telangan...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses State Appeals in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Landowners Entitled to Retain Excess Land After Repeal of Tamil Nadu Urban Land Ceiling Act, 1961. The Court held that since the land had not vested in the State prior to the repeal, the landowners are entitled to retain the excess land under Section 4 of the Tamil Nadu Urban Land Ceiling (Repeal) Act, 1999.

29 Jan 2025

The case involves three writ appeals filed by the State of Tamil Nadu and the Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA) against a common order...

Supreme Court

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

5 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Petitions on Lapsing of Land Acquisition Under Section 24 of the Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Land Acquisition Proceedings Challenged for Non-Compliance with Provisions of the New Land Acquisition Law.

10 Mar 2016

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various landowners against the State of Karnataka, the Mysore Urban ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Seeking Declaration that Land Acquisition Proceedings Have Lapsed Under Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. Multiple petitioners challenged notifications and sought relief under Section 24 of the 2013 Act in connection with acquisitions by Bangalore Development Authority and Mysore Urban Development Authority.

10 Mar 2016

Multiple writ petitions were filed by various landowners challenging land acquisition proceedings initiated by the Bangalore Development Authority and...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Multiple Writ Petitions on Land Acquisition Lapsing Under the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013. The petitions sought declarations that acquisition proceedings under the Bangalore Development Authority Act and Mysore Urban Development Authority Act had lapsed due to non-compliance with Section 24 of the 2013 Act.

10 Mar 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petitions Seeking Declaration of Lapse of Land Acquisition Proceedings Under Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Petitioners Challenge Notifications and Awards Under Bangalore Development Authority Act Asserting Lapse Under Section 24 of 2013 Act.

10 Mar 2016

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed between 2013 and 2015 by multiple landowners against the State of Karna...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landholder's Petition Challenging Condition Imposed by State to Waive Right to Seek Enhanced Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act. State Cannot Compel Landholder to Furnish Undertaking Not to Seek Reference Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 as Condition for Release of Compensation for Land Previously Under Urban Land Ceiling Act.

12 Aug 2010

The petitioner, Baliram s/o Ramaji Ghate, was a landholder whose land was initially covered under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Under Urban Land Ceiling Act — Land Not Acquired Due to Non-Compliance with Section 10(3) and Section 11(1) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976. The court held that mere notification does not vest land in the State without actual possession, and exemption applications under Sections 20 and 21 must be considered before declaring land surplus.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Bhagwant Dharmaraj Radke and Omprakash @ Dipchand Durgaprasad Agrawal against the State of Mahara...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)