Search Results for "Untoward incident"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Untoward incident"

208 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 208 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Bona Fide Passenger and Untoward Incident Established. Fall from Train Due to Jerks Constitutes Untoward Incident Under Section 123(c)(2) of Railways Act, 1989; Railway's Suicide Defence Fails for Non-Production of Loco Pilot Book.

20 Jun 2024

The appeal arises from a claim for compensation under Section 16 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, filed by the legal representatives of Mohd....

High Court

Court Reverses Railway Claims Tribunal Decision, Awards Rs. 8 Lakhs in Compensation for Untoward Incident. The appellant, mistakenly boarding the wrong train and sustaining injuries, was deemed a bona fide passenger eligible for compensation under the Railways Act, 1989.

20 Jun 2024

This appeal, filed under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, challenges the judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, wh...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Death of Passenger Due to Untoward Incident Entitled to Compensation Under Section 124-A of Indian Railways Act, 1989. The Court held that the deceased was a bona fide passenger and the incident of falling from a train is an untoward incident, reversing the Tribunal's dismissal.

19 Apr 2024

The appellants, legal representatives of the deceased Jayamma, filed an appeal against the judgment of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Bengaluru, dated 2...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Compensation Claim for Railway Accident Death Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989 — Bona Fide Passenger Presumption Applies When Ticket Found on Body. The court held that the death of a passenger who fell from a train due to jolting and crowd is an untoward incident, and the railway is strictly liable to pay compensation.

5 May 2023

The case involves an appeal by the claimants (widow and children of the deceased) against the dismissal of their compensation claim by the Railway Cla...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Death of Passenger Due to Accidental Fall from Train. Claimants Entitled to Compensation Under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989 as Deceased Was a Bona Fide Passenger and Death Occurred in a Railway Accident.

10 Jul 2019

The present appeal was filed by the original applicants, Nagorao s/o Gangaram Kamble and Sow. Vithabai w/o Nagorao Kamble, challenging the judgment an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim Case — Widow and Children Entitled to Compensation Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989. Death of a passenger due to accidental fall from train is an 'untoward incident' under Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989, and the railway administration is liable to pay compensation regardless of negligence.

10 Jul 2019

The present appeal was filed by the original claimants, the widow and children of the deceased Ramlu Renalwar, challenging the judgment and award of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Sets Aside Tribunal's Dismissal of Claim. Held that the claimant was a bona fide passenger and the accident was an 'untoward incident' under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, entitling him to compensation.

10 Jul 2019

The appellant, Dalit s/o Tukaram Mudkhede, filed a claim application before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur Bench, seeking compensation for injuri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation for Passenger Falling from Moving Train While Boarding - Untoward Incident Under Railways Act. The court held that an accident caused from a moving train while trying to board or deboard it is covered by the definition of 'untoward incident' under Section 123(c)(2) of the Railways Act, 1989, and the appellant's amputation injury is covered by the amended schedule, entitling him to compensation.

3 Jul 2017

The appellant, Shashikant Dhage, filed a claim under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, seeking compensation for grievous injuries sustained in a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Railway Appeal in Passenger Fall Case — Untoward Incident Under Section 123(c)(2) of Railways Act, 1989. Death of a bona fide passenger who fell from a running train due to a sudden jerk is an untoward incident, and the railway is liable to pay compensation under Section 124A.

1 Jul 2017

The appeal was filed by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager, Central Railway, against the order of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nag...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Upholds Railway Claims Tribunal Award in Favour of Deceased Vendor's Family — Fall from Train Due to Jerk Constitutes Untoward Incident Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989. The court held that the railway administration failed to prove the exception of self-inflicted injury, and the death of a passenger selling articles in a train is an untoward incident attracting strict liability.

1 Jul 2017

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager of South Central Railway, against a judgment of the Railway Clai...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)