Search Results for "Uber"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Uber"

17 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 17 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Bombay Asserts Jurisdiction in Writ Petition Against Income Tax Demands Post-Transfer of Jurisdiction. Court Holds That Cause of Action Arose in Part Within Its Territory Due to Amalgamation and Transfer Under Section 127 of Income Tax Act, 1961, Directing Production of Underlying Orders and Staying Recovery.

24 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a writ petition filed by Petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenging outstanding income tax demands to...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Arrest of Vessel for Maritime Claim Under Admiralty Act, 2017 — Bunker Supply Constitutes Necessaries. The court held that supply of bunkers to a vessel is a maritime claim under Section 4(1)(l) of the Admiralty (Jurisdiction & Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act, 2017, and granted conditional arrest subject to furnishing of security.

6 Feb 2026

The plaintiff, Om Freight Forwarders Limited, a company engaged in freight forwarding and bunker supply, filed a civil suit under the Admiralty (Juris...

High Court

Bombay High Court Rules in Admiralty Jurisdiction Case: Cockette Marine Oil vs. OSV Beas Dolphin. Court Rejects Summary Judgment Amidst Insolvency Proceedings, Highlights Impact of IBC Moratorium on Maritime Claims.

23 Aug 2024

The Bombay High Court, under the Admiralty jurisdiction, considered an application for summary judgment filed by Cockette Marine Oil DMCC against OSV ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Admiralty Suit for Arrest of Vessel — Holds That a Beneficial Owner of a Vessel Can Be Considered a 'Person Interested' Under Section 5 of the Admiralty (Jurisdiction and Settlement of Maritime Claims) Act, 2017. The Court set aside the impugned order and allowed the appellant to file an affidavit of disclosure of interest in the vessel.

8 Mar 2023

The appeal was filed by Angsley Investments Limited, a company incorporated in St. Vincent and the Grenadines, against an order dated 28th March 2006 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Bike Taxi Aggregator to Operate Pending Policy Formulation — Motor Vehicles Act Does Not Prohibit Two-Wheeler Transport. Court holds that the absence of a state policy for bike taxis does not render the service illegal, and the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 permits contract carriage permits for two-wheelers.

20 Jan 2023

The petitioners, Roppen Transportation Services Pvt Ltd (an aggregator operating bike taxis under the brand 'Rapido') and its director Shantanu Sharma...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against NCLAT Order in Competition Law Case — Locus Standi of Informant Under Section 19(1)(a) of Competition Act, 2002. The Court held that the expression 'any person' in Section 19(1)(a) is wide and does not require the informant to be a consumer or competitor.

9 Sep 2020

The appeal arose from an information filed by Samir Agrawal, an independent law practitioner, before the Competition Commission of India (CCI) on 13.0...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Uber's Appeal Against CCI Investigation Order for Alleged Abuse of Dominant Position Through Predatory Pricing. The Court held that information showing Uber incurred a loss of Rs.204 per trip was sufficient to form a prima facie case under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002.

3 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed two civil appeals filed by Uber India Systems Pvt. Ltd. against orders of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) and th...

High Court

KAHC010069912016_1

10 Nov 2016

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Allege Rules Are Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violate Fundamental Rights.

10 Nov 2016

The writ petitions arose from the notification of the Karnataka On-Demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016, by the State Government o...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Pronounces Order on Constitutional Challenge to Karnataka On-demand Transportation Technology Aggregators Rules, 2016. Petitioners Assert Rules Ultra Vires Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and Violative of Freedom of Trade and Commerce Under Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 301 of the Constitution.

10 Nov 2016

The Karnataka High Court considered a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the Karnataka On-demand Transportation Techno...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)