Search Results for "Time Limit Lapse"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Time Limit Lapse"

774 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 774 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Final Decree Application in Mortgage Suit Despite Limitation — Time Spent in Earlier Litigation Excluded Under Section 14 of Limitation Act. The court held that the plaintiff's final decree application was within limitation as the period during which the defendant challenged the ex parte decree was excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

29 Jan 2026

The case arises from a mortgage suit filed by M/s. Visu Financiers (plaintiff) against G. Sundararaj (defendant) for recovery of money due on a mortga...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment on Condonation of Delay in Land Acquisition Appeal Filed Beyond 120 Days Under 2013 Act. Issue of Whether Section 5 of Limitation Act Applies to Section 74(1) of Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013 Remains to be Decided.

25 Sep 2019

The Deputy Commissioner and Special Land Acquisition Officer, Bengaluru (SLAO) filed an appeal under Section 54(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses BDA Appeals in Land Acquisition Lapse Case — Acquisition for J.P. Nagar Layout Declared Lapsed. Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 mandates award within two years of final notification; failure results in lapse of proceedings.

17 Oct 2017

The case involves two writ appeals filed by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) and the Special Land Acquisition Officer against an order dated ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Declaring Land Acquisition Lapsed Under Section 11A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Award Not Made Within Two Years of Final Declaration. Failure to Comply with Mandatory Time Limit Under Section 11A Results in Lapse of Acquisition Proceedings for Land in Sy.No.44/2 at Yelechenahalli Village.

28 Feb 2013

The petitioner, K L Ramesh, claiming to be the owner of land measuring 3 acres 9 guntas in Sy.No.44/2 at Yelechenahalli Village, Uttarahalli Hobli, Ba...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case Due to Non-Communication of Award Under Section 12(2) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Proceedings Lapse Under Section 24(2) of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 as Award Not Communicated Before New Act Came Into Force.

4 Aug 2016

The petitioners, Jitesh Bhaiyalal Sahu and Rashmi Jitesh Sahu, owned 1.95 hectares of land in Mouza Morangana, Amravati. The State initiated acquisiti...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Land Acquisition Notifications in Favor of Landowner Due to Lapse Under Section 11-A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Award Made Beyond Two-Year Period from Section 6 Declaration Invalidates Entire Acquisition Proceedings.

27 Jan 2022

The petitioner, Mrs. Aienla Semelhago, challenged the notifications under Sections 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, concerning the acquisiti...

High Court

Full Bench of Bombay High Court Considers Whether Section 24(2) of RFCTLARR Act Lapses Acquisitions Under MRTP Act — Reference to Determine Interplay Between Central and State Land Acquisition Laws. The core issue was whether acquisition proceedings initiated under Sections 125-127 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 fall within the lapsing provision of the 2013 Central Act.

13 Oct 2017

The matter before the Full Bench of the Bombay High Court arose from three writ petitions filed by landowners whose lands were acquired under the prov...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Condonation of Delay by Karnataka Housing Board under Limitation Act. High Court's Order Condoning 3966-Day Delay in Filing Second Appeal is Scrutinized on Grounds of State Lethargy and Sufficient Cause.

1 Jan 1970

The appeal before the Supreme Court arose from a judgment of the High Court of Karnataka condoning a delay of 3966 days in filing a second appeal by t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Against Dismissal of Section 34 Application as Time-Barred. Limitation for Filing Application Under Section 34(3) Runs from Receipt of Award; Suit Filed Within Extended 30-Day Period Without Showing Sufficient Cause for Delay Cannot be Entertained.

26 Nov 2019

This appeal arose from the dismissal of an arbitration suit filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbit...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Interprets Time Limits for Awards Under Land Acquisition Laws in Appeal Against High Court Ruling on Lapse of Proceedings. The Court Examines Whether the Two-Year Period Under Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Applies Post-Repeal or the Twelve-Month Period Under Section 25 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Governs Awards Under Section 24(1)(a).

10 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Maharashtra for the Gosikhurd Project. On 16th June 2011, a notification...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)