Search Results for "Terminal Benefits"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Terminal Benefits"

306 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 306 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Pension to Casual Labourers with Temporary Status in Department of Posts — Holds That Denial of Pensionary Benefits to Employees Who Rendered Decades of Service Is Arbitrary and Violative of Social Justice Principles. The Court ruled that temporary status casual labourers treated at par with temporary Group D employees are entitled to pension under the CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, and regularisation is not a precondition.

1 Jun 2026

The case involves three appeals by former casual labourers (Night Guards) of the Department of Posts, or their legal representatives, who challenged t...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Retired Professor's Petition for Regular Pension — University's Denial of Pension for Non-Contributory Service Period Set Aside. Pension is a right, not a bounty, and must be computed on last drawn salary; University cannot deny pension to employees who served prior to adoption of pension scheme.

7 Mar 2025

The petitioner, M.A. Dhavaleshwar, was appointed as a Professor in Sangolli Rayanna College (affiliated to Rani Chennamma University) on 26-07-1982. H...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Retired Professor's Petition for Regular Pension — University Cannot Deny Pension for Non-Contributory Service Prior to Adoption of Pension Scheme. Denial of pension on ground of non-contributory service is arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.

7 Mar 2025

The petitioner, M.A. Dhavaleshwar, was appointed as a Professor on 26-07-1982 at Sangolli Rayanna Grade-I College, Rani Chennamma University. He retir...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Retired Principal's Petition for Regular Pension Based on Last Drawn Salary. Pensionary Benefits Must Be Calculated on Actual Last Pay Drawn at Retirement, Not Reduced Pay After Re-Employment, Under Karnataka Civil Services Rules, 1964.

7 Mar 2025

The petitioner, M.A. Dhavaleshwar, was appointed as a Professor on 26-07-1982 and later became Principal of Sangolli Rayanna Grade-I College, Rani Che...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Terminal Excise Duty Refund Dispute Under Foreign Trade Policy. Export Oriented Units Not Entitled to Refund as Procurement from Domestic Tariff Area Units Was Ab Initio Exempt from Excise Duty Under Paragraphs 6.2(b) and 6.11(c)(ii) of Foreign Trade Policy, 2009-2014.

4 Jan 2022

The dispute involved appeals by Export Oriented Units (EOUs) challenging the refusal of refund claims for Terminal Excise Duty (TED) paid on excisable...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Armed Forces Pension Case, Upholding Terminal Benefits for Resigning Officer. Late Entrant Eligibility Under Regulation 15 of Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961 Applied as Officer Commissioned at Age 39 and Served 15 Years Before Resignation.

30 Sep 2021

The dispute arose from the Armed Forces Tribunal's order directing the Union of India to process terminal and pensionary benefits for a former Army Me...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs Payment of Pension and Terminal Benefits to Retired Employee Despite Pending Criminal Proceedings — Service Benefits Cannot Be Withheld Indefinitely Without Enquiry. Pension is a right, not a bounty, and withholding it without disciplinary proceedings is arbitrary under Article 14 of the Constitution.

9 Nov 2020

The petitioner, K.T. Thimmaiah, was a permanent employee of the Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (KPTCL) working as a Store Keeper. In...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses PIL Seeking Closure of Oil Tanking Activity for Lack of Credible Evidence of Environmental Violation. Court holds that mere apprehension of harm without concrete proof of violation of environmental norms or statutory conditions does not warrant closure of a lawful industrial activity.

22 Jan 2015

The judgment pertains to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by M/s. Nitol Jinn Trust and Mr. Peter Dias against the Union of India, State of Goa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Airport Operator's Challenge to Customs Regulation Requiring Bill of Entry for Export Goods. Regulation 5(2) of Handling of Cargo in Customs Areas Regulations, 2009 Held Intra Vires Customs Act, 1962 and Constitutional.

13 Oct 2014

The petitioner, M/s. Mumbai International Airport Private Ltd., filed two writ petitions challenging the validity of Regulation 5(2) of the Handling o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Disqualification from Tender for Violation of Non-Compete Clause. Clause 8.31 of Licence Agreement Between GTI and JNPT Prohibited Promoters from Bidding for Competing Projects, and Subsequent Government Policy Could Not Be Read into Existing Contract.

10 Mar 2010

The petitioner, APM Terminals B.V., a Dutch company, along with Container Corporation of India Ltd (CONCOR), formed a joint venture company called Gat...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)