Search Results for "Tampering Witnesses"

688 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 688 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Acquits Accused in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Procedural Irregularities. Conviction under Sections 135 and 138 of Electricity Act, 2003 set aside as prosecution failed to prove tampering beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Anandrao Madhavrao Shinde, was convicted by the learned Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, in Special Case No.126 of 2006 for offe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Related Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitnesses were interested and their evidence was inconsistent with medical and other evidence.

The case pertains to the murder of Dnyandeo Thakare, who was allegedly assaulted by two accused, Laxman Bhatkar and Devidas Wankhede, on 6th April 200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Electricity Theft Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Theft of Energy Allegation Fails as Prosecution Did Not Prove Tampering or Unauthorized Use Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 39 and 44 of the Indian Electricity Act, 1910.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of Girish Shankarlal Ostawal and Dilip Shankarlal Ostawal by the Judicial Magistrate First Cla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eye Witness and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eye witness was found to be planted and not credible.

The appellants, Waghya alias Manoj Bhaiyalal Uke and Sandip s/o Bhaiyalal Uke, were convicted by the Sessions Judge, Wardha, for the murder of Pintu u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Conviction Based on Sufficient Evidence of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe, Despite Hostile Witnesses, Upholds Trial Court Verdict.

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, a Junior Training Officer in a Government ITI College, Saundatti, for demanding and accepting a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Director Convicted for Electricity Theft — Acquittal Restored Due to Lack of Evidence of Personal Involvement. Vicarious liability under Sections 39 and 44 of Indian Electricity Act, 1910 cannot be imposed without proof of direct participation or knowledge of tampering.

The appellant, Mahaveer, was a director of M/s Rushi Steels and Alloys Pvt. Ltd., a company in Jalana, Maharashtra. The Maharashtra State Electricity ...