Search Results for "Taking of Possession"

24 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 24 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Appeals by Appellant Challenging Land Acquisition for APMC Mega Market -- Acquisition Upheld Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and Karnataka Amendment Act 33/1991

Appellant filed writ appeals against the dismissal of its writ petitions challenging land acquisition for an APMC Mega Market. The Trust owned lands i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Compensation for Land Acquired Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Market Value Assessment Based on Auction Sale Prices with Deductions for Development Held Reasonable, Affirming High Court's Decision.

The dispute arose from cross-appeals concerning the assessment of market value for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, in Narsingi and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Development Authority in Land Acquisition Lapse Dispute. Acquisition Does Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) as Possession Was Taken, Despite Non-Payment of Compensation, Following Constitution Bench Ruling in Indore Development Authority.

The dispute arose from a land acquisition matter where the Delhi Development Authority appealed against a High Court judgment that declared the acquis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Case, Reversing High Court's Lapse Finding. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act When Possession Was Taken, Despite Non-Payment of Compensation Due to Title Dispute.

The Supreme Court heard two appeals arising from a Delhi High Court order concerning land acquisition proceedings initiated in 1989-1992. The responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Land Acquisition Collector's Appeal Against High Court's Lapse Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act as Possession Was Partially Taken and Interim Period Excluded, Applying Indore Development Authority Over Pune Municipal Corporation.

The dispute involved an appeal against a High Court order that declared land acquisition proceedings lapsed under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Government Appeal in Land Acquisition Lapse Dispute, Quashing High Court's Declaration. Acquisition Proceedings Do Not Lapse Under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act When Possession Was Taken, as Held by Constitution Bench Overruling Prior Precedent.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals by the Government of NCT of Delhi against judgments of the High Court of Delhi that declared land acquisition...