Search Results for "Ssangyong Engineering"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...

Search Results for "Ssangyong Engineering"

68 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 68 result(s)

High Court

High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case, Restoring Arbitral Award Set Aside by Single Judge. Limited Judicial Review Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Precludes Re-appreciation of Evidence Unless Award Shocks Conscience or Conflicts with Public Policy.

9 Mar 2026

The dispute arose between Appellant, a foreign company manufacturing biscuits in Zimbabwe, and Respondent, an Indian partnership firm, regarding the s...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Commercial Contract Dispute — Joint and Several Liability of Holding Company and Subsidiary Upheld. Division Bench's restoration of award under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 affirmed, rejecting challenge on grounds of patent illegality and public policy.

3 Sep 2024

The case arises from a dispute between OPG Power Generation Private Limited (OPG) and its holding company Gita Power and Infrastructure Private Limite...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal in Commercial Dispute Over Arbitral Award on Repairs and Interest. The court upheld the Single Judge's order setting aside findings on repairs as perverse and reduced interest rate from 18% to 9% per annum.

18 Aug 2022

The appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, was filed by Interocean Shipping (India) Pvt Ltd against an order of the le...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Setting Aside of Arbitral Award in Price Escalation Dispute. Interpretation of price escalation clause by arbitral tribunal found patently illegal as it ignored the contractual formula, leading to setting aside of award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

3 Aug 2022

The case involves a challenge under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against a judgment dated 31st March 2017 passed by a lear...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Patent Illegality and Perversity in Awarding Damages for Breach of Agreement for Sale of Land. The court found that the arbitral tribunal failed to consider mitigation of damages and made a perverse computation of damages based on an incorrect price per acre.

8 Jul 2022

The case involves a commercial appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Jagannath Parmeshwar Mills Private Limi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals in Arbitration Act Case Regarding Foreign Award Enforcement. Non-Signatory Parties Not Bound by Arbitration Agreement Under Alter Ego Doctrine for Enforcement Under Part II of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

10 Aug 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard civil appeals concerning the recognition and enforcement of foreign awards under Part II of the Arbitration and Conci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award — Holds That Single Judge Erred in Setting Aside Award on Grounds of Patent Illegality and Public Policy. The Court Reinstated the Arbitral Tribunal's Findings on Oral Agreement and Quantum of Damages.

20 Apr 2021

The appellant, Ratnam Sudesh Iyer, filed an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 against the judgment of a learned Si...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses SLP Against Rejection of Review in Arbitration Dispute — Earlier SLP Against Main Judgment Dismissed Without Liberty. Principle of Finality Bars Subsequent Challenge to Review Order.

22 May 2020

The Supreme Court dismissed special leave petitions filed by Patel Engineering Ltd. against the High Court of Meghalaya's order rejecting their review...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Against Arbitral Award in Contract Dispute — No Patent Illegality Found in Arbitrator's Interpretation of Contract Terms. The court held that the arbitrator's construction of the contract was a possible view and not perverse, thus no interference under Section 34(2-A) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

2 Mar 2020

The petitioners, Gateway Distriparks Limited and Gateway Rail Freight Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Favour of Contractor in Postal Department Contract Dispute — Claims for Idle Labour, Machinery, and Loss of Profit Held Not Supported by Evidence and Contrary to Contract Terms. The court held that an arbitrator cannot award damages for idle resources or loss of profit without proof of deployment or anticipated profits, and such awards are perverse and patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Feb 2020

The Petitioner, Union of India through the Postal Department, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challen...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)