Search Results for "Selective acceptance"

119 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 119 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Gram Panchayat Adhikari Recruitment Dispute — Waiting List Not Permissible Under 2015 Rules. Division Bench erred in directing consideration of candidates beyond the select list as 2015 Rules override 1978 Rules and do not provide for a waiting list.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the State of Uttar Pradesh against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court Division Bench. The dispute...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Sub-Classification Within Scheduled Castes for Reservation in Punjab Act. State can provide preferential treatment to more backward castes without tinkering with Presidential List under Article 341.

The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Section 4(5) of the Punjab Scheduled Caste and Backward Classes (Reservation in Services) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Notification Including Jat Community in Central Backward Classes List as Union Cabinet Rejected NCBC Advice Without Adequate Consideration. Inclusion by Notification Dated 04.03.2014 Violates Statutory Scheme Under National Commission for Backward Classes Act, 1993.

The present group of writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution challenged a Notification dated 04.03.2014 issued by the Union of India, whic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Blacklisting by Railways — Violation of Natural Justice and Unreasoned Order. The court set aside the blacklisting order for being arbitrary and in violation of principles of natural justice.

The petitioner, Apar Industries Ltd., a major supplier of Over Head Equipment to the Indian Railways, challenged a blacklisting order passed by the Ra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Provisional Acceptance of Change Report in Trust Dispute Due to Non-Application of Mind and Delay Beyond Statutory Period. Section 22(2) of Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 requires provisional acceptance within 15 days of change report; order passed after 5 months is invalid.

The petitioner, Banjara Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Balsur through its Secretary Gulabdas Nandu Chavan, filed a writ petition challenging two orders: (1...