Search Results for "Sedition"

27 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 27 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation and Quashes Sedition Charge Against Cartoonist. Freedom of Speech and Expression Under Article 19(1)(a) Protects Political Satire and Cartoons Unless They Incite Violence or Public Disorder.

The present Public Interest Litigation was filed by Sanskar Marathe, a practicing advocate, challenging the arrest of Assem Trivedi, a political carto...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Journalists in Sedition Case for Reporting on Alleged Corruption. Reporting of public interest matters does not constitute sedition under Section 124A IPC unless there is incitement to violence or public disorder.

The case involves nine criminal writ petitions filed by journalists and media persons (Sudheer Rikhari, Nikhil Vasudevan, Subhanshu Singh, Sumant Bala...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay hears application by author of book challenging its forfeiture under Section 95 CrPC. The notification alleged that the book contained derogatory statements about Muslim religion punishable under Sections 153A and 295A IPC.

The applicant, an advocate and author of the book 'Islam - A Concept of Political World Invasion By Muslims', published in 2003, challenged a notifica...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Notice Against Advocate in Bombay Police Act Case — Notice Issued Without Proper Application of Mind and Based on Vague Allegations. Section 56(b) of Bombay Police Act, 1951 Requires Subjective Satisfaction Based on Material, Not Mere Police Reports.

The petitioner, Sangram s/o Janardhan Tupe, a practicing advocate in Beed, challenged a notice dated 26-7-2010 issued by the Sub Divisional Magistrate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO. 943 OF 2021

The Supreme Court of India, in a combined proceeding, dealt with a batch of writ petitions, special leave petitions, and contempt petitions invoking A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Summons Issued Under Section 126 BNSS for Non-Compliance with Procedural Safeguards. The Court Holds That Executive Magistrate Must First Pass Order Under Section 130 BNSS Before Issuing Summons.

The writ petition before the High Court of Karnataka challenged the summons dated 30.09.2025 issued by the Executive Magistrate (Respondent No.3) unde...