Search Results for "Section 33A Stamp Act"

24 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 24 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Levy of Deficit Stamp Duty Under Indian Stamp Act, 1899. Alternative remedy under Section 33A(3) held efficacious and writ not maintainable absent procedural irregularity or violation of natural justice.

The petitioner, a director of Sree Rajeswari Mill Ltd., executed a sale agreement dated 16.12.2020 in favor of one K. Rakesh Kumar for certain propert...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Appeal Against Order Quashing Stamp Duty Demand as Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period. Sub-Registrar's Demand for Deficit Stamp Duty on Power of Attorney Treated as Conveyance Fails Due to Bar of Three-Year Limitation Under Section 33A of Indian Stamp Act, 1899.

The appeal arose from an order of a learned Single Judge of the Madras High Court, Madurai Bench, allowing a writ petition filed by the respondent cha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Deficit Stamp Duty Demand in Development Agreement Case — Delay and Lack of Speaking Order Render Proceedings Invalid. Section 33A of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 invoked after 10 years without proper application of mind; order set aside.

The Petitioner, Axayraj Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. (now Moongipa Realty Pvt. Ltd.), a developer, entered into a Development Agreement with D.N. Nagar Shree A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Stamp Duty Order as Time-Barred and Without Jurisdiction Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 -- Development Agreement Not Deemed Conveyance Due to Subsequent Flat Purchaser Agreements

The petitioner,  filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 26 April 2014 passed by the Joint District Registrar and Collector of Stamps, P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Registration of Deed Beyond Limitation Period by Excluding Time Taken for Stamp Duty Adjudication — Time Spent Before Stamp Authorities Must Be Excluded Under Sections 23 and 25 of Registration Act, 1908

The petitioner, V. H. Property Solution LLP, executed a Deed of Conveyance on 06.10.2015 and presented it to the Stamp Duty Authorities on 10.12.2015,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Unexecuted Lease Agreement — No Liability Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Adjudication under Section 31 cannot be basis for demand when document is not executed and no stamp duty is chargeable.

The petitioner, Crisil Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, had been in occupation of office premises at Hiranandani Business Park, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admitted Second Appeal on Questions of Law Concerning Insolvency Act and Auction Sale Confirmation. The Court Framed Eight Substantial Questions Involving Interpretation of Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920, Order 21 Rule 92 CPC, and Res Judicata in Tenancy Proceedings.

The matter concerned a long-standing insolvency dispute dating back to 1959. Roopsingh Chainsingh Ture filed Insolvency Application No.12 of 1959 befo...