Search Results for "Section 269SS Income Tax Act"

16 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 16 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Cheque Bounce Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Appellant failed to establish that the loan of Rs.3,00,000 was legally recoverable debt under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Arti Rajesh Karangutkar, filed a criminal appeal against the acquittal of respondent No.1, Anna Rocky Fernandes, by the Metropolitan Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Conviction for Cheque Bounce Upheld. Dishonour of Cheque for Discharge of Existing Debt Attracts Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The criminal revision petition was filed by the accused-petitioner challenging the judgment dated 31.10.2012 passed by the II Addl. District and Sessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Based on Change of Opinion on Already Disclosed Loan Transactions is Invalid.

The petitioner, Jainam Investments, a partnership firm engaged in trading of shares and securities, filed its income tax return for Assessment Year 20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Sets Aside Acquittal. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 not rebutted; failure to show loan in income tax returns does not invalidate legally enforceable debt.

The appellant, Pushpa Sanchalal Kothari, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the acquitt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case — Presumption Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted. Accused Failed to Prove Defence of Blank Cheque Given as Security, Leading to Confirmation of Sentence Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The case arises from a complaint filed by the respondent (complainant) against the petitioner (accused) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case. Journal Entry Set-off for Loan Repayment Does Not Violate Section 269T of Income Tax Act, 1961, as It Is Not a Repayment but an Adjustment of Mutual Claims.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which deleted the penalty ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Complainant's Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Reverses Acquittal Due to Improper Appreciation of Evidence. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands unless rebutted by accused with probable defence.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by the original complainant, Sandeep Shirodkar, against the acquittal of the accused, Shankar Dhawaskar, ...