Search Results for "Section 25H Industrial Disputes Act"

42 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 42 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Retrenchment Reemployment Case — Industrial Court's Direction for Reemployment Quashed. Section 25H of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Requires Proof of Retrenchment and Employer's Proposal to Employ, Which Was Not Established.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Remote Sensing Application Centre, challenged the judgment and order dated 07.02.2007 passed by the Industrial Court in Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Daily-Wager in Industrial Dispute — Violation of Sections 25G and 25H of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Established. Junior Workers Retained While Senior Daily-Wager Terminated, Labour Court's Order of Reinstatement Without Backwages Upheld.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Executive Engineer and Sub Divisional Officer of the Public Works Department, Maharashtra, challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Retrenched Worker Seeking Absorption as Permanent Employee in University — Land Acquisition for Research Centre Entitles Displaced Person to Preference in Employment Under Section 40 of the Maharashtra Agricultural Universities (Krishi Vidyapeeth) Act, 1960.

The petitioner, Sumanbai Bhaurao Shinde, a retrenched worker of the respondent Marathwada Agricultural University, filed a writ petition seeking direc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Daily Wage Workers Seeking Reinstatement Under Kalelkar Award. Workers Held Not Covered by Award but Entitled to Retrenchment Compensation Under Chapter VA of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The case involves an appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 15.10.19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court's Order Converting Dismissal into Retrenchment for Workman Found Guilty of Misconduct. Punishment of Dismissal Held Disproportionate to Misconduct of Theft of Company Property; Workman Entitled to Retrenchment Compensation and Notice Pay.

The petitioner, Kirloskar Copeland Ltd., challenged the order of the Labour Court, Satara, dated 24th April 1996, in Complaint (ULP) No.17 of 1988, an...