Search Results for "Section 11(1) Preventive Detention Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Section 11(1) Preventive Detention Act"

40 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 40 result(s)

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under PASA for Lack of Material Showing Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Section 3(2) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs and past antecedents cannot justify preventive detention without evidence of disturbance to public order.

16 Feb 2026

The petitioner, Ajaybhai @ Babu Mevalal Yadav, through his sister Sapna Mevalal Yadav, filed a Special Criminal Application under Articles 226 and 227...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Detention Order Under PASA Act for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Preventive detention based on prohibition offences set aside as no evidence of threat to public order or tranquility.

16 Jan 2026

The petitioner, Rajubhai Aalabhai Kodiyatar, filed a Special Criminal Application before the Gujarat High Court apprehending detention under the Gujar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Material to Show Public Order Threat. Theft of sand and IPC offences held to be law and order issues, not public order.

15 Dec 2020

The petitioner, Narayan Radhakishan Bhusari, challenged his preventive detention under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders Under COFEPOSA for Non-Application of Mind and Violation of Right to Representation. Detenu's Right to Make Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Infringed Due to Non-Supply of Grounds in Understandable Language and Unexplained Delay.

25 Jun 2019

The Bombay High Court allowed two criminal writ petitions challenging preventive detention orders passed under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Defective Translation of Grounds of Detention. Error in Translating CR Number in Marathi Version Violates Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution.

22 Feb 2017

The petitioner, Sunil Bharat Govari, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Grant of Bail in Similar Cases. The court held that failure to consider the possibility of bail in similar cases vitiates the subjective satisfaction required for preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981.

29 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Vaibhav @ Pintya Bharat Mane, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 23.11.2015 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Illegible Documents and Lack of Marathi Translation. Preventive Detention Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution When Grounds Not Communicated Effectively.

25 Jun 2015

The petitioner, Rahul Ambadas Jadhav, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-offenders ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Supply of Bail Order — Failure to Provide Vital Document Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution. The detenu's right to make an effective representation was infringed when the bail order, referred to in the grounds of detention, was not supplied to him, rendering the detention order invalid under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.

16 Apr 2012

The petitioner, Mohd. Shakil Khan, uncle of the detenu Nadeem Shaikh, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detenu's Retraction of Statement Not Considered by Detaining Authority

11 Oct 2011

The petitioner, son of the detenu Balwinder Singh, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a detention order ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind and Non-Supply of Relevant Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated.

26 Oct 2010

The petitioner, brother of the detenu, challenged the detention order dated 2nd April 2009 passed by respondent no.2 under Section 3(1) of the Conserv...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)