Search Results for "Safeguard Duty"

1174 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1174 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Denial of Exemption for Transitional Product Specific Safeguard Duty under Section 8C of Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Petitioner Asserts Notification No.96/2009-Cus. Intended to Exempt All Safeguard Duties and Phrase 'under section 8B' is Discriminatory.

The petitioner, a public limited company manufacturing pneumatic tyres, regularly imported Carbon Black from the People’s Republic of China. Carbon ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Safeguard Duty on Aluminum Foil Imports. Court upholds imposition of provisional safeguard duty under Section 8B of Customs Tariff Act, 1975, finding no violation of natural justice as petitioner was heard before final determination.

The petitioner, P. G. Foils Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging Customs Notification No.26/2009 dat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Condition in Customs Circular Requiring Bank Guarantee for Accredited Importers. Condition Requiring Bank Guarantee for Differential Duty in Provisional Assessment Held Valid as Reasonable Safeguard Under Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioner, Shah Pulp & Paper Mills Limited, challenged the legality and validity of a condition contained in paragraph 7(iii) of a circular issue...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Public Order Impact — Single Criminal Case and In-Camera Statements Insufficient to Establish Detriment to Public Order.

The petitioner, Nilesh Sunil Pendulkar, challenged an order dated 06.10.2023 passed by the District Magistrate, Ahmednagar, under Section 3(1) of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Confirmation by Advisory Board. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Violated as Grounds of Detention Were Not Properly Considered.

The petitioner, Shrinivas Kishor Sanga, challenged his detention order dated 30/10/2018 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Solapur, under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Subjective Satisfaction. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Grounds Were Stale and Irrelevant, Violating Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Ganesh Narayan Mane, challenged the detention order dated 08.09.2017 passed by the Commissioner of Police...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Resurrects Issue of Mandatory Naval NOC in Development Near Defence Establishments. The Court Examines Validity of Stop Work Notice and Deemed Commencement Certificate Under DCPR 2034, Citing Precedents and Regulatory Vacuum.

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the stop work notice dated 24 October 2025 issued by MHADA and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition Filed by Customs Department in Customs Act Case — DRI Officers Held as Proper Officers. The Court overruled earlier decisions and upheld Section 28(11) of the Customs Act, 1962 as constitutionally valid, restoring the Department's power to issue show cause notices.

The Supreme Court, in a batch of petitions led by Review Petition No. 400 of 2021, considered the correctness of its earlier judgment in M/s Canon Ind...