Search Results for "SEBI consent order"

149 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 149 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SEBI Consent Guidelines Requiring Pendency of Proceedings. Requirement of pendency of court proceedings or adjudication for consent applications under SEBI Guidelines is not arbitrary and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Shilpa Stock Broker Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the validity of cl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Petition to Quash Criminal Proceedings Based on SEBI Consent Order. The Court Reviews the Effect of Consent Order under Sections 11 and 11B of the SEBI Act on Pending Trial for Offences under Indian Penal Code and Prevention of Corruption Act.

The petitioner, an accused in two criminal cases arising from alleged illegalities in the Initial Public Offerings (IPOs) of Yes Bank Limited and Infr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Challenge to SEBI Special Court's Rejection of Compounding Application Under Section 24A of SEBI Act. Writ Petition Filed Against Order Denying Compounding of Offence Under Section 24(2) for Non-Payment of Penalty Without SEBI Consent.

The case involved a criminal writ petition filed by N.H. Securities Ltd. and its directors seeking to quash an order of the SEBI Special Court that ha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging SEBI Settlement Regulations and Rejection of Settlement Proposal. Internal Committee's Power to Impose Conditions Precedent Upheld as Valid and Not Ultra Vires.

The petitioners, Abans Enterprises Ltd. and its promoter Abhishek Bansal, challenged the validity of regulations 6(1)(f) and 13(2)(ba) of the Securiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears SEBI's Application to Recall Sanction of Composite Scheme in Fertilizers Merger Case. Securities Regulator Alleges Material Non-Disclosure and Accounting Violations in Scheme Involving Listed and Unlisted Companies Under Companies Act, 1956.

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) filed applications on 21.02.2013 seeking recall of orders of the Bombay High Court dated 17.06.2011 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging SEBI's Ex-Parte Interim Order in Securities Market Manipulation Case. Court upholds SEBI's power to issue ex-parte interim directions under Section 11B of SEBI Act, 1992 to protect market integrity.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions filed by Hemant Kulshrestha and Vinay Bansal challenging an ex-parte interim order passed by the Se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows SEBI's Appeal Against Interim Order Restraining Adjudication Proceedings. Civil Suit Against SEBI Held Not Maintainable Due to Alternative Remedy Under SEBI Act, 1992.

The case involves an appeal by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) against an interim order passed by a Single Judge of the Bombay High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Expulsion of Trading Member for Violating Gross Exposure Limits and Failing to Maintain Capital Adequacy. Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 - Section 22F - Appeal against Securities Appellate Tribunal order upholding expulsion from National Stock Exchange membership.

The appellant, Rusoday Securities Ltd., was a trading member of the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd. (NSE) since November 1994 and gave an undert...