Search Results for "Rule 4(2)(a)"

14 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 14 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Arrest Order in BNSS and IT Act Case. Arrest Upheld as Police Complied with Mandatory Notice Under Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and Procedural Safeguards, Despite Petitioner's Evasion and Refusal to Cooperate.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a criminal petition filed by the petitioner, who was accused No.1 in Crime No.271 of 2025, challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Sentence in POCSO Case — State Appeal Against Inadequate Sentence Allowed. Court holds that Section 5(1) of POCSO Act mandates minimum sentence of ten years and trial court's imposition of less than ten years is illegal.

The State of Karnataka filed an appeal under Section 377(1)(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the inadequacy of the sentence imp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against NCLAT Order in Competition Law Case — Locus Standi of Informant Under Section 19(1)(a) of Competition Act, 2002. The Court held that the expression 'any person' in Section 19(1)(a) is wide and does not require the informant to be a consumer or competitor.

The appeal arose from an information filed by Samir Agrawal, an independent law practitioner, before the Competition Commission of India (CCI) on 13.0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Revenue in Block of Assets Case — Industrial Gala Sale Taxed as Short Term Capital Gain Under Section 50. Non-Use of Asset Does Not Remove It from Block of Assets; Depreciation History Determines Tax Treatment.

The case involves an income tax reference by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai Bench, at the instance of the assessee, Smt. Meena v. Pamnani, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Removal of Bank Officer in State Bank of India Disciplinary Case. Penalty of Removal from Service under Rule 67(i) of State Bank of India Officers Service Rules Upheld as Not Disproportionate to Charges of Irregularities as Branch Manager.

The petitioner, Gopal Vajani, was employed by the State Bank of India (the Bank) since 1978, rising from Clerk-cum-typist to Scale-III officer. He was...