Search Results for "Representative appointment"

686 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 686 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Claim for Compassionate Appointment Due to 15-Year Delay. Unexplained delay and lack of bona fides defeat the purpose of compassionate appointment, which is to provide immediate financial relief.

The petitioner, Smt. Veena, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging an endorsement dated 07.05.2022...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Workman's Right to Advocate in Domestic Enquiry. Management Representative with HR Background and Enquiry Experience Deemed Legally Trained Mind, Justifying Workman's Right to Legal Representation Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The case involves a challenge by the employer, The Indian Express (P) Ltd and its officers, against an order of the Industrial Court at Thane dated 9 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Untrained Teacher Appointed Against Reserved Post, Quashes Removal for Non-Acquisition of D.Ed. Within Five Years. The court held that the condition to acquire qualification within five years was not applicable to appointment against a reserved post under the MEPS Act.

The petitioner, Miss Sonali Mallikarjun Bedgnur, was appointed as an assistant teacher by respondent no.1, Dnyansampada Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, purs...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Under Section 482 CrPC Challenging Rejection of Application Under Section 305(6) CrPC for Appointment as Company Representative. The court held that the trial court's order doubting the genuineness of resignation was unsustainable and directed fresh consideration.

The petitioner, Krishnaswamy Sridhar, was accused No.4 in Special C.C. No.245/2002 pending before the XLVI Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Shareholder Suit Challenging Director Appointments for Lack of Jurisdiction. Dispute Over Rights Under Articles of Association Falls Within Exclusive Jurisdiction of Company Law Board Under Companies Act, 1956.

The suit was filed by shareholders of a banking company, Yes Bank, challenging resolutions relating to the appointment of directors and seeking declar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Compromise Decrees Passed Without Appointment of Representatives Under U.P. Court of Wards Act. Section 56 of the U.P. Court of Wards Act, 1912, Held to be Directory and Not Mandatory, Validating the Compromise Decrees.

The dispute arose from two cross-suits between the appellant, proprietor of Ganeshpur Estate, and the respondent, proprietor of Ramnagar Estate, conce...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Workers Challenging Industrial Court Order Refusing Stay of Union Election. Held that the Industrial Court's order was not perverse and did not suffer from any jurisdictional error, and the writ court's supervisory jurisdiction did not warrant interference.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by 25 workers (appellants) against an order of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing thei...