Bombay High Court on Slum Evictions: Contractual Disputes to Be Raised Separately
19 Jan 2026The Petitioner filed a writ petition challenging eviction orders passed by the Slum Rehabilitation Authority and the Apex Grievance Redressal Committe...
Search Results for "Rehabilitation agreement"
353 result(s) found
Found 353 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes AGRC Order in Slum Rehabilitation Dispute — Section 13(1) 120-Day Period Not Mandatory for Owner's Proposal. Owner's Preferential Right to Develop Slum Land Not Extinguished by Delay Beyond 120 Days Under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act.
26 Aug 2024The case involves a challenge to an order of the Apex Grievance Redressal Committee (AGRC) dated 17th February, 2023, which rejected a redevelopment p...
- 897
High Court
Land: Basilica of Our Lady of the Mount Challenges SRA's Acquisition Attempt. Protecting Property Rights and Redevelopment Plans in Mumbai's Slum Rehabilitation Dispute
11 Jun 2024Maharashtra Slum Rehabilitation Authority (SRA) Act, where the petitioner, Basilica of Our Lady of the Mount, Mumbai, contests SRA's attempt to acquir...
- 464
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Partially Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit Against Sick Industrial Company — Suspension of Proceedings Under Section 22(1) of SICA Does Not Bar Suit for Unadmitted Debt. High Court's Grant of 24% Compound Interest Reduced to 12% Simple Interest.
29 Apr 2024The case involves a dispute between Fertilizer Corporation of India Ltd. (FCIL), a public sector undertaking, and M/s Coromandal Sacks Private Limited...
- 413
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Approves Compensation Scheme for Tribal Landowners in Coal Mining Acquisition - Mahanadi Coalfields Directed to Pay Compensation for Lands Acquired in 1987-1989. Market value determined as of 2010 survey date due to 28-year delay in compensation.
3 Nov 2022The case concerns the long-pending compensation claims of landowners, predominantly tribal communities, whose lands were acquired for coal mining by M...
- 127
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to SRA Committee's Order on Slum Dweller Eligibility. The Court upheld the High Power Committee's jurisdiction to determine eligibility for rehabilitation under the Slum Rehabilitation Scheme, rejecting the petitioners' claim for inclusion of additional tenants.
10 Feb 2015The case involves two writ petitions filed by Housing Development and Infrastructure Ltd. and another challenging the order of the High Power Committe...
- 90
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Sections 14 and 17 of Maharashtra Slum Act in Land Acquisition Challenge. Challenge to Acquisition Under Section 14 and Award Under Section 17 Rejected as Provisions Held Intra Vires Constitution.
16 Jan 2015The petitioners, Nenshi Monji (Bombay), a Family Trust and Others, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the acquisi...
- 105
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Slum Development Agreement Due to Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 42 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act. Civil Court Cannot Entertain Disputes Relating to Slum Rehabilitation Schemes as Exclusive Jurisdiction Vests with Slum Authorities.
30 Oct 2014The plaintiff, Lokhandwala Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for specific performance of a development agreement dated 10 August 2003, entered in...
- 142
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Slum Rehabilitation Scheme Approval — No Violation of Natural Justice Found as Petitioners Were Given Opportunity of Hearing. The court declined to interfere in writ jurisdiction as the challenge involved disputed questions of fact and the petitioners had an alternative remedy of appeal under the Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971.
23 Feb 2011The petitioners, Shri Atesham Ahmed Khan and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the approval of a slum rehabilitat...
- 48
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to SRA Order in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. CEO's Direction to Process Letter of Intent Upheld as 70% Consent of Eligible Members Was Validly Obtained Under DCR 33(10).
28 Jan 2011The case involves a slum rehabilitation scheme under DCR 33(10) of the Development Control Regulations for Greater Mumbai. The petitioners, Lokhandwal...
- 59
