Search Results for "Reference under Section 18"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Reference under Section 18"

31 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 31 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Reference Case Due to Liberty Reserved by High Court — Limitation Period Not Applicable When Claimants Pursued Earlier Remedies. The Court held that the reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 was not barred by limitation because the claimants had challenged the acquisition and the High Court had reserved liberty to seek enhancement, and the reference was filed within six months of the dismissal of the special leave petition.

1 Jan 2022

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the original claimants (appellants) against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court which had upheld the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Reference Application Under Land Acquisition Act — Petitioner Not Served with Notices, Limitation Runs from Date of Knowledge. The court held that the Land Acquisition Officer must consider the plea of knowledge before rejecting a reference application as time-barred under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

5 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Francisco Nicolau Fernandes, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Land Acquisition Officer (LAO) dated 17th November 201...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Land Acquisition Compensation Redetermination Petition for Delay and Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Petitioners' application under Section 28A rejected as they failed to file within prescribed period and did not obtain reference under Section 18.

24 Feb 2014

The petitioners, three agriculturists, challenged an order dated 30.6.2011 passed by the Land Acquisition Officer, Nanded, rejecting their application...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Collector's Order Rejecting Reference Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Notice Served on Sister-in-Law Not Valid Service Under Section 12(2). Service of notice on a female member not being a male member of the family is invalid, and limitation for reference runs from date of knowledge of award.

1 Sep 2006

The petitioner, Vithal Bhaskar Thakur, owned land bearing Survey No.198, Hissa No.9, which was acquired by the State of Maharashtra for the New Bombay...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landowner's Reference Application Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Rejects Technical Bar of Limitation. Notice Under Section 12(2) Received After Award, Limitation Runs From Receipt of Notice, Not Award Date.

10 Apr 2006

The petitioner, Ashok Amgonda Birajdar, owned agricultural land admeasuring 2 hectares and 45 ares bearing Gat No.218 at village Donaj, Taluka Mangalw...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Reference Court Erred in Rejecting Claim Without Considering Evidence. Enhancement of Compensation Granted Based on Comparable Sale Instances Under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

20 Dec 2013

The appellant, Luis Alex Cardozo, owned land in Margao, Goa, which was acquired by the respondents (Deputy Collector and Executive Engineer) for the c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Applications for Withdrawal of Land Acquisition Appeals in Vidya Vinay Vivek Co-op. Housing Society v. State of Maharashtra — Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Withdrawal of Appeal — Held that once a reference under Section 18 is made, the right to withdraw the appeal under Section 48 is lost.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves three civil applications filed by the applicants (Vidya Vinay Vivek Co-op. Housing Society Limited, Vinod Amrutlal Shah, and Virendr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landowners' Petitions for Higher Compensation in Land Acquisition Case Due to Limitation and Lack of Evidence. Petitioners failed to seek reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 within time and did not produce evidence of higher market value.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves multiple writ petitions filed by landowners from Poyanje, Panvel Taluka, Raigad District, challenging the compensation awarded for t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Revision Applications Due to Delay Condonation and Enhanced Compensation Claims. The court held that delay in filing reference under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 should be condoned and matters remitted for fresh adjudication.

18 Oct 2019

The judgment involves multiple civil revision applications filed by landowners whose lands were acquired for public purposes under the Land Acquisitio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Market Value Enhanced from Rs.50,000 to Rs.1,00,000 per Acre Based on Comparable Sale Instance. The court held that the Reference Court erred in ignoring a contemporaneous sale deed for adjacent land, which established a higher market value under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

17 Aug 2012

The appellant, Jaysukh Raghla Patel, filed a first appeal under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, challenging the judgment and order dated...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)