Search Results for "Railway accident compensation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Railway accident compensation"

347 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 347 result(s)

High Court

High Court Allows Compensation to Dependents of Railway Employee in Railway Accident Case, Reversing Tribunal's Denial Based on Contradictory Evidence. Accidental Fall from Moving Train Constitutes Untoward Incident Under Section 123(c)(2) of Railways Act, 1989, and Railway Employee with Free Pass Qualifies as Bonafide Passenger Regardless of Pass Recovery at Site.

9 Mar 2026

The appeal concerned a compensation claim under the Railways Act, 1989 filed by dependents of a railway employee who died after falling from a train. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation Claim for Train Accident Victim Under Railways Act, 1989 — Amputation of Leg Due to Fall from Train Held as 'Accidental Falling' from Train Carrying Passengers.

21 Jun 2018

The appellant, Ramesh Istari @ Istaru Kore, filed a claim for compensation before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, alleging that on 24.2.2016, whi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Compensation for Passenger Falling from Moving Train While Boarding - Untoward Incident Under Railways Act. The court held that an accident caused from a moving train while trying to board or deboard it is covered by the definition of 'untoward incident' under Section 123(c)(2) of the Railways Act, 1989, and the appellant's amputation injury is covered by the amended schedule, entitling him to compensation.

3 Jul 2017

The appellant, Shashikant Dhage, filed a claim under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, seeking compensation for grievous injuries sustained in a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Compensation Claim in Railway Accident Case — Non-Recovery of Ticket Not Fatal to Claim if Prima Facie Proof of Bona Fide Passenger Exists. The Court held that once claimants produce prima facie evidence of ticket purchase, burden shifts to Railways to disprove it under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989.

1 Jan 2025

The appeal arose from the death of Sanjesh Kumar Yagnik, who allegedly fell from a running train (Ranthambore Express) on 19.05.2017 due to overcrowdi...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case — Deceased's Fall from Train Constitutes Untoward Incident Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989. The court held that the railway administration is strictly liable for compensation for death due to falling from a train, and the Tribunal erred in dismissing the claim.

8 Jul 2015

The appellants, the widow and minor children of Moinuddin Ansari, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, seeking compensation for h...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Railway Accident Compensation Case. Claimant's Fall from Train Due to Jerk and Rush Constitutes 'Untoward Incident' Under Section 123(c) of the Railways Act, 1989.

4 Dec 2013

The Union of India, through the General Manager of South Central Railway, appealed against the judgment and award dated 21st September 2010 passed by ...

High Court

High Court Allows Compensation Claim in Railway Accident Case, Setting Aside Tribunal's Rejection Based on Insufficient Evidence. Court Held Co-Passenger Testimony Established Deceased as Bonafide Passenger and Death as Untoward Incident Under Railways Act, 1989, Despite Absence of Ticket and Official Reports from Non-Eyewitnesses.

16 Mar 2026

The appeal arose from a judgment dated 22nd March 2019 by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Mumbai, which rejected an application for compensation concerni...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in Railways Compensation Case, Clarifying Calculation Method. The court held that compensation for untoward incidents under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989 must be calculated as per the rate on the date of accident with interest, and if the revised amount on award date is higher, the higher amount is payable without interest on the revised sum.

29 Jan 2019

The case arises from an untoward incident on 02.10.2003 when Dasarath Yadav, while travelling in a local train from Burdwan to Howrah, peeped his head...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Railways Appeal in Passenger Death Case. Strict Liability for Untoward Incident Under Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 Upheld as Deceased Was Bona Fide Passenger.

28 Feb 2012

The Union of India, General Manager, Central Railways, filed an appeal under Section 23 of the Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, challenging the awar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Railway Appeal in Passenger Fall Case — Untoward Incident Under Section 123(c)(2) of Railways Act, 1989. Death of a bona fide passenger who fell from a running train due to a sudden jerk is an untoward incident, and the railway is liable to pay compensation under Section 124A.

1 Jul 2017

The appeal was filed by the Union of India, represented by the General Manager, Central Railway, against the order of the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nag...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)