Search Results for "Proprietary Concern"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Proprietary Concern"

367 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 367 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Allows Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Reverses First Appellate Court's Decree and Restores Trial Court's Dismissal. The Court held that the first appellate court failed to frame proper points for determination under Order 41 Rule 31 CPC, and its judgment was perverse and not based on evidence.

16 Jul 2026

The case involves a property dispute among siblings over ancestral property in Campal, Panaji, Goa. The original plaintiffs (respondents) filed a suit...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Against BWSSB for Unauthorised Laying of Sewer Pipelines in Private Lands Without Acquisition. Petitioners Challenge Section 77 as Unconstitutional and Seek Compensation for Violation of Right to Property Under Article 300A.

1 Jun 2026

...

High Court

Madras High Court Adjudicated a Commercial Suit for Recovery of Chit Maturity Amount Against a Partnership Firm and Partners. The plaintiff claimed the maturity value based on an acknowledgment of liability and promissory estoppel, while the defendants raised a prior suit for injunction and accounts.

21 Jan 2025

The plaintiff, a construction company, filed a commercial suit against a partnership firm (first defendant) and its partners (defendants 2 to 6) for r...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Complaint in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Non-Compliance with Statutory Notice Requirements Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The Court Held That the Demand Notice Was Not Served at the Correct Address of the Accused, Rendering the Complaint Not Maintainable.

19 Mar 2024

The petitioner, Baburao S/o Hemachandrappa Kalal, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Liability of Legal Representatives in Consumer Dispute — Death of Developer Does Not Extinguish Obligations Under Development Agreement. Legal heirs of deceased developer are bound to execute all obligations under a development agreement, including monetary payments and completion of construction, as per the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

15 Mar 2023

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals filed by the legal representatives of a deceased developer against the order of the National Consumer Disputes Red...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Cognizance Orders in Dishonour of Cheque Cases Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice. The court held that when a demand notice sent by registered post is returned as 'unclaimed', the complainant must prove deliberate avoidance by the accused to sustain cognizance under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

21 Sep 2022

The petitioner, Sri H.N. Nagaraj, filed multiple criminal petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash orders...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Part on Operational Creditor Status but Upholds Dismissal on Limitation in Insolvency Case. The court held that a purchaser does not qualify as an operational creditor under Section 5(20) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the application under Section 9 was barred by limitation due to debt arising from 2013 transactions.

4 Feb 2022

The appeal arose from a dispute under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, involving the appellant, Consolidated Construction Consortium Limited,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case, Reverses Acquittal. The court held that the trial court erred in failing to apply the presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and that the accused failed to rebut the presumption.

23 Jul 2019

The appellant, Doshi Brothers, a proprietary concern, filed a private complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, against M/s...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Case — Transfer of Capital Asset from Sole Proprietorship to Company Held as Succession Under Section 47(xiv) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Capital gains arising from transfer of proprietary concern to a company where the assessee holds at least 50% shares is exempt from tax.

30 Jul 2014

The revenue (appellant) filed an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Complaint by Constituted Attorney in Dishonour of Cheque Case — Reinstates Process Quashed by Sessions Court. Constituted Attorney Can File Complaint Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 on Behalf of Payee.

18 Aug 2010

The petitioner, Vilas Baliram Sawant, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, which quashed the ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)