W.P.(MD)No.9304 of 2019
26 Feb 2025...
Search Results for "Postal Services"
160 result(s) found
Found 160 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Departmental Promotion Committee Recommendations in Postal Department Recruitment. Court Holds That Candidates Who Were Not Considered for Promotion Due to Non-Inclusion of Their Names in the Zone of Consideration Must Be Considered Afresh.
17 Feb 2025The petitioners, a group of 86 individuals employed in various capacities such as Postal Assistant, Sorting Assistant, Postman, and Mail Guard in the ...
- 1831
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Pension Benefits Case, Setting Aside High Court Order. Employee Entitled to Include Central Government Service in Qualifying Service Under Rule 25(ix) of Gujarat Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 2022 as Implicit Absorption Through Technical Resignation and NOC-Based Recruitment.
2 Feb 2024The dispute concerned a government employee's entitlement to pensionary benefits encompassing service rendered under both Central and State Government...
- 227
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Permanent Lok Adalat's Jurisdiction in Service Dispute. The Court held that the dispute concerning recovery of excess payment from pension and gratuity of a retired employee of Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran relates to a public utility service under Section 22A(b) of the Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, and the Permanent Lok Adalat has jurisdiction.
10 Aug 2022The Petitioner, the Chief Administrative Officer of Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 29 June 2019 pas...
- 23
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeals in Gramin Dak Sevaks Pension Case — GDS Service Cannot Be Counted for Qualifying Service Under CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972. The Court held that service as Gramin Dak Sevak is not 'qualifying service' under the 1972 Rules and cannot be added to regular service for pension eligibility.
8 Nov 2019The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals arising from decisions of various Central Administrative Tribunals and High Courts on the common quest...
- 403
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds OROP Benefit for Army Postal Service Personnel on Deputation from Department of Posts. Personnel of APS on deputation from Department of Posts are entitled to One Rank One Pension as per Government Circular dated 7th November 2015.
5 Nov 2019The case involves an appeal by the Union of India against an order of the Armed Forces Tribunal, Regional Bench, Jabalpur, which allowed an Original A...
- 217
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Postal Department, Holds Gramin Dak Sewaks Entitled to Gratuity Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Voluntary Resignation Does Not Bar Gratuity as Section 4(1)(b) of the Act Overrides Rule 6(13) of the Gramin Dak Sewak (Conduct & Engagement) Rules, 2011.
15 Mar 2019The Supreme Court considered two appeals arising from the Punjab & Haryana High Court concerning the entitlement of Gramin Dak Sewaks (GDS) to gratuit...
- 249
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Teacher Dismissed for Lack of Qualification, Holds Termination Void for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice and Section 5 of M.E.P.S. Act, 1977. Termination Order Issued Without Notice or Authority Set Aside, Petitioner Entitled to Reinstatement with Back Wages.
22 Jul 2016The petitioner, Smt. Mangala d/o Keshav Mule, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher on 01.06.1987 by the Manav Samaj Unnati Mandal, a private school. ...
- 128
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Quashes Arbitrary Revision of Seniority of Directors in Indian Postal Service for Violation of Article 16 of Constitution. Selective Promotion Not Based on Seniority and Revision Without Rule Held Discriminatory.
2 Apr 1968The petitioners, S. K. Ghosh and another, were promoted from Postal Superintendents Service Class II to the time scale of Class I Service in the India...
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Caste Scrutiny Committee's Adverse Orders in Service Matters — Held That Committee Must Provide Opportunity of Hearing Before Passing Adverse Orders.
30 Nov -0001The petitioners, employees of the Postal Department, filed writ petitions challenging adverse orders passed by the Scheduled Tribes Caste Certificate ...
- 152
