Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

HomeJudgement

Scroll Down To Discover

High Court

W.P.(MD)No.9304 of 2019

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Madurai

Admin

2026-07-27 15:54:40

Font size:

Issue of Consideration

W.P.(MD)No.9304 of 2019

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (02) 272

W.P.(MD)No.9304 of 2019

2025-02-26

M.Jothiraman

Mr.NA.Palaniyandi (for Petitioner), Mr.R.Senthi Kumar (for R1), Mr.K.R.Badurus Zaman (for R5 & R6)

S.Jeya Roslin

1.The Under Secretary, Government of India, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, New Delhi; 2.The Postmaster General, Central Region – Tamil Nadu, Tiruchirappalli; 3.The Director, Central Government Health Scheme, New Delhi; 4.The Officer In-charge, Directorate General of Health Services, New Delhi; 5.The Additional Director, Health and Family Welfare, Chennai; 6.The Chief Medical Officer, Postal Dispensary, Trichy

Nature of Litigation

Service matter - regularisation of employment

Remedy Sought

Petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing the fifth respondent to direct respondents 2 and 6 to permit her to work as a Pharmacist at Postal Dispensary, Tiruchirappalli based on her earlier appointment and continuous service from the year 2001, and to consider her representation dated 01.04.2019.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was not permitted to work after the merger of postal dispensaries with CGHS, as she was considered an outsider and not a permanent employee; her service had never been regularised despite long continuous service.

Submissions/Arguments

The petitioner contended that she was orthopaedically handicapped, appointed in a leave vacancy as a Pharmacist, never regularised despite working continuously for over ten years, and that the respondents wrongly interpreted the merger order dated 21.12.2018 to exclude her, treating her as an outsider.

Judgment Excerpts

This writ petition has been filed directing the fifth respondent to direct the respondents 2 and 6 to permit the petitioner to work as a Pharmacist, at Postal Dispensary, Tiruchirappalli based on her earlier appointment and continuous service from the year 2001 by considering her representation, dated 01.04.2019. The above said merger order permitted only the permanent employees not for the outsiders.

Procedural History

Writ petition filed before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court seeking mandamus. No prior litigation mentioned in the extracted text.

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India: Article 226

One-Time Download (₹149 ₹99) Get Subscription

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)

W.P.(MD)No.9304 of 2019

Issue of Consideration

Case Details

Nature of Litigation

Remedy Sought

Filing Reason

Submissions/Arguments

Judgment Excerpts

Procedural History

Acts & Sections

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment Case — ...

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and La...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising Out of Use ...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Disability A...

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Criminal Antec...

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Rajya Sabha Nomination Due ...

Supreme Court Allows Pension to Casual Labourers with Temporary Status in Department of Po...