WRIT PETITION NO. 7034 OF 2024
25 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "Perquisites"
68 result(s) found
Found 68 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds High Court Order Directing DSGMC to Pay Salaries and Re-employ Staff After Unauthorized School Closure. NDMC and DSGMC Held Liable for Service Benefits of Employees Following Demolition of School Building in Violation of Stay Order.
28 Aug 2024The case pertains to appeals filed by the New Delhi Municipal Council (NDMC) and the Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management Committee (DSGMC) against a common...
- 537
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Section 17(2)(viii) of Income Tax Act and Rule 3(7)(i) of Income Tax Rules in Bank Employee Loan Perquisite Case. Delegation of Power to Prescribe Fringe Benefits Held Not Excessive and Use of SBI Prime Lending Rate as Benchmark Upheld as Non-Arbitrary.
7 May 2024The Supreme Court, in a common judgment, dismissed appeals filed by staff unions and officers' associations of various banks challenging the constitut...
- 410
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Deputy Registrars Challenging Recovery of Excess Salary Due to Mistaken Pay Rule Interpretation. Court holds that recovery of excess payments made without employee fault violates Article 300A of the Constitution and principles of equity.
10 Mar 2023The petitioners, eight former and current Deputy Registrars of the Bombay High Court, filed a writ petition challenging the decision of the Registrar ...
- 14
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Activates Dormant Constitutional Provision for Appointment of Ad Hoc Judges to Address High Court Backlog. The Court held that Article 224A of the Constitution of India can be utilized to appoint retired High Court judges as ad hoc judges to tackle over 57 lakh pending cases and 40% vacancies, emphasizing dynamic interpretation and consent requirements.
20 Apr 2021The Supreme Court of India, in a public interest litigation filed by Lok Prahari, addressed the critical issue of backlog in High Courts, with over 57...
- 494
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment on Challenge to Fringe Benefit Tax Provisions. Petitions question constitutional validity of Chapter XII-H of Income Tax Act, 1961 as violative of Article 14 and beyond legislative competence.
6 Dec 2019The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard three writ petitions filed by M/s T.T.K. Prestige Ltd. and another, M/s N. Rangarao & Sons, and Karnata...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows State Bank of India's Appeal Against High Court Order Setting Aside Salary Revision for Officer Posted Abroad. Contractual Clause Permitting Revision of Salary Upheld as Binding Under Section 18 of State Bank of India Act, 1955.
12 Feb 2019The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State Bank of India and others against the judgment of the Bombay High Court. The respondent, Ravind...
- 180
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Tax on Medical Reimbursement Above Rs.15,000 as Perquisite Under Section 17(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Medical reimbursement exceeding Rs.15,000 per annum treated as taxable perquisite is not arbitrary or discriminatory and does not violate Articles 14 or 21 of the Constitution.
13 Nov 2006The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by bank employees' associations and an individual officer challenging the constitutional validity of ...
- 150
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Market Value Determination for Share Valuation in Oppression Case — Director's Rights Cease Upon Valuation. The court held that the market value determined by the Company Law Board for shares held by a minority shareholder was just and proper, and that the shareholder ceases to be a director upon valuation, not upon payment.
16 Jun 2005The case involves two appeals filed against an order of the Company Law Board (CLB) dated 5.5.2003 in Company Petition No. 12 of 1998. The appellant, ...
- 111
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition Challenging Election on Ground of Office of Profit — Chairman of Goa Khadi and Village Industries Board Not an Office of Profit Under Article 191(1)(a) of Constitution. The court held that the Board is a statutory body with independent funds and the Chairman's honorarium does not constitute profit.
27 May 2005The petitioner, an unsuccessful candidate in the 2002 Goa Legislative Assembly election for the Siolim constituency, filed an election petition under ...
- 182
