Search Results for "Penalty Section 114AA"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "Penalty Section 114AA"

11 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of IGST with Interest for Zero-Rated Export Supplies Under CGST and IGST Acts. Petitioner entitled to refund of IGST paid on export of goods along with interest from date of shipping bill till actual refund.

15 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Shri Charan Singh Surjit Singh Gujral, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of J...

High Court

Madras High Court Considers Appeal Challenging Customs Broker's Penalty Under Section 114AA, Questions Jurisdiction Over MEIS Classification. Three substantial questions of law framed under Section 130 of Customs Act, 1944 regarding the authority of customs to penalise for MEIS scrip classification and applicability of Section 28/28AAA.

15 Apr 2026

The matter concerned an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1944 before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, filed by a licensed Custo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Customs Duty Demand on Imported Textile Machinery — Holds That Show Cause Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period Under Section 28 of Customs Act, 1962 Is Time-Barred. The court quashed the show cause notice as the department failed to establish any fraud or suppression to justify the extended period of limitation.

20 Feb 2026

The petitioners, Karl Mayer STOLL Textilmaschinenfabrik GmbH and M/s. Karl Mayer India Private Limited, imported textile machinery and cleared the goo...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Quashes Penalties on Customs Broker for Importer's Misdeclaration — No Mens Rea or Knowledge of Fraud Established. Section 112(a), 112(b), 114AA of Customs Act, 1962 require active involvement or knowledge for penalty imposition on customs broker.

22 Jan 2026

The petitioner, M/s. Mathuradas Narandas and Sons Forwarders Ltd., a customs broker, was engaged by GKR Traders Pvt. Ltd., the importer, to facilitate...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Importer in Customs Classification and Valuation Dispute — Head End Equipment Classified Under CTH 8543 8999 and Software/Service Charges Included in Assessable Value. The court upheld the Tribunal's finding that the imported goods constituted a complete functional unit and that the appellant's mis-declaration of classification and value justified penalties under Sections 112(a) and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962.

27 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Indusind Media & Communications Ltd. against the order of the Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Customs Appeals on Import of Multi-Function Devices — Redemption of Restricted Goods Permitted on Payment of Market Value. Import of used MFDs without authorisation under Foreign Trade Policy held redeemable under Section 125 Customs Act, 1962, as restricted items, not prohibited.

24 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by the Commissioner of Customs against the release of imported Multi-Function Devices (MFDs) by the respondents, M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 129E Customs Act, 1962 Mandating Predeposit for Appeals. Challenge to Order-in-Original Dismissed as No Hearing Opportunity Was Denied.

19 Jun 2017

The petitioners, partners of M/s Bright International, challenged the constitutional validity of Section 129E of the Customs Act, 1962, as amended by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Section 129E Customs Act, 1962 Mandating Predeposit for Appeals. Challenge to Order-in-Original Dismissed as No Appeal Filed.

19 Jun 2017

The Bombay High Court disposed of two writ petitions filed by Haresh Nagindas Vora and Sachin Laxmichand Shah, partners of M/s Bright International, c...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Release of Seized Gold Due to Non-Issuance of Notice Under Section 124 of Customs Act, 1962 Within Prescribed Period Under Section 110(2). The court held that continued seizure beyond six months without notice under Section 124 is illegal and directed release of gold.

22 Apr 2015

The petitioner, K. Abdulla Kunhi Abdul Rahaman, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnatak...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Partnership Firm and Partner Against Penalty Under Customs Act — Double Jeopardy Plea Rejected. Penalty on firm and partner under Section 112 of Customs Act, 1962 is permissible as firm is a separate entity for penalty purposes.

6 Jul 2011

The appeal arose from an order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) dated 12 February 2004, which reduced penalties impo...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)