Search Results for "Penalty Reduction"

523 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 523 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Surety's Appeal Against Forfeiture of Bond Amount — Reduces Penalty from Rs.40,000 to Rs.5,000. Surety's inability to produce absconding accused does not warrant forfeiture of entire bond amount under Section 446(3) CrPC.

The appellant, Sri Muniyappa, was a surety for accused Nos.1 and 3 in Sessions Case No.56/2016 before the II Additional District & Sessions Judge, Tum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reduces Penalty for Non-Appearance in Cheque Dishonour Case — Petitioner's Penalty Reduced from Rs.10,000 to Rs.1,000. The court held that the penalty imposed for jumping bail was harsh and reduced it, while confirming costs to the complainant and directing expeditious trial.

The petitioner, Gautam Laxman Dongare, was the accused in a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, relating to ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Modifies Disciplinary Punishment of Reduction in Pay Scale Imposed on Retired Junior Assistant for Insubordination. Reduction for Unspecified Period with Cumulative Effect Held Impermissible, Punishment Modified to One Year Without Affecting Pension.

The petitioner, K.Periyasamy, was originally appointed as an Office Assistant on 06.07.2000 and later promoted to Senior Bailiff in the cadre of Junio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Disciplinary Penalty Against Executive Engineer for Negligence in Rate Justification. Reduction in pay by one stage for one year with cumulative effect confirmed as proportionate penalty under Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965.

The petitioner, Shri B.M. Mittal, an Executive Engineer, challenged the judgment and order dated 30.9.2004 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Stamp Vendor-Postman Challenging Reduction in Pay for Misappropriation of Rs.330/-. Disciplinary action upheld as punishment was not disproportionate and findings were based on evidence.

The petitioner, Shailendra Sahedeo Mondkar, was a stamp vendor-postman in the office of Bharat Chamber Post Office, Kalbadevi, Mumbai. He was selected...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reduction of Penalty in Disciplinary Proceeding for Pay Fixation Misconduct — Proportionality of Punishment Upheld. Court held that while misconduct was established, removal was disproportionate and Appellate Authority's modification to reduction to lowest scale was justified.

The petitioner, Rajesh Ashok Mankar, was employed as a Computer Operator with Konkan Railway Corporation Limited (KRCL). He was initially appointed on...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reduces Customs Penalty for Signing Documents in Good Faith — Section 112(a) Customs Act, 1962. Petitioner's limited role and lack of knowledge of illegal importation warranted reduction of penalty from Rs.7.5 lakhs to Rs.1 lakh.

The petitioner, Ashok Chhabildas, a sole proprietor of M/s A.V. Impex, challenged the order of CEGAT dated 19/1/2001 which confirmed the order-in-orig...