Search Results for "Patta Transfer"

101 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 101 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Tahsildar to Consider Patta Transfer Application in Patta Passbook Act Case — Petitioner's Representation Pending for Three Months. Authority Must Act Within Reasonable Time Under Section 10 of Patta Passbook Act Read with Rule 4(2).

The petitioner, Revathi Meenammal, purchased a property measuring 2400 sq.ft (Plot Nos.615 and 616 of Ezhil Nagar) in S.No.102/8A at T.Kunnathur Bit-I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Capital Gains Tax Case — Transfer of Property Not Completed Under Section 2(47)(v) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Agreement to Sell and Power of Attorney Did Not Confer Possession or Part Performance Under Section 53A of Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The appellant-assessee, M/s Seshasayee Steels P. Ltd., entered into an agreement to sell on 15.05.1998 with Vijay Santhi Builders Ltd. for sale of lan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Patta Transfer Rejection for Violation of Natural Justice. Order Quashed as Authority Failed to Assign Reasons and Afford Hearing Before Rejecting Patta Application.

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking to quash an order dated 17.02.2025 passed by the Deputy Tahsildar, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Disposes of Writ Petition Seeking to Quash Patta Transfer Order Due to Pending Civil Suit. Court Directs Expeditious Disposal of Suit and Status Quo to Prevent Conflicting Decisions on Title.

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an order dated 01.12.2022 passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows State Appeal in Stamp Duty Dispute — Conveyance Deed Not Exempt Under Article 5(e) of Schedule I of Bombay Stamp Act, 1958. Transfer of Development Rights (TDR) by CIDCO to Developer Held Liable to Stamp Duty as Conveyance, Not as Instrument of Lease or License.

The case involves two Letters Patent Appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra and other stamp authorities against a common judgment of a learned Sing...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Suit for Declaration and Possession in Property Identity Dispute. Plaintiff Established Use of Name Pushpa/Pushpalata Interchangeably and Held to Be True Owner of Flat Under Cooperative Society Share Certificate.

This suit involved a dispute between two sisters-in-law over the ownership of a residential flat in Mumbai. The plaintiff, Pushpalata Sohanlal Sharma,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Denial of Ryotwari Patta for Tank Poramboke Land. Land Classified as 'Peddacheruvu Tank' Under Section 2-A of Andhra Pradesh Inams (Abolition & Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1956 Cannot Be Granted Ryotwari Patta.

The appeal arose from a dispute over the implementation of ryotwari pattas allegedly granted in 1980 to the appellants' predecessor-in-interest for la...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Settlement Deed Set Aside for Fraud and Misrepresentation. Continuous Possession and Revenue Records Support Plaintiff's Claim Over Sister's Alleged Fraudulent Deed.

The case involves a property dispute between two sisters, Mahalakshmi (original plaintiff, now deceased) and Rajeswari (first defendant). The suit pro...