Search Results for "Original Side Rule 986"

35 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 35 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case, Restoring Arbitral Award Set Aside by Single Judge. Limited Judicial Review Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Precludes Re-appreciation of Evidence Unless Award Shocks Conscience or Conflicts with Public Policy.

The dispute arose between Appellant, a foreign company manufacturing biscuits in Zimbabwe, and Respondent, an Indian partnership firm, regarding the s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Rent Control Suit — Confirms Findings of Subletting and Non-User of Premises. Landlord's Eviction Suit Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Upheld as Tenants Failed to Prove Bona Fide Use and Consent for Subletting.

The case arises from a landlord-tenant dispute concerning Shop No.2 and rear portion of Shop No.1 in Supariwala Mansion, Parel, Mumbai. The original p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Extension of Time to Restore Company Application in Section 10F Appeal. Extension of Time to Remove Office Objections Was Upheld as a Matter Between Applicant and Court, with Intervenor's Rights Reserved.

The dispute arose from a long-standing conflict over management and shareholding of K.C. Agro Pvt. Ltd. between the deceased, Shri Girdharlal Dalal, a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment to Plaint in Property Dispute Due to Subsequent Dispossession. Amendment Based on Events After Issues Framed Is Permissible Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC Despite Delay.

The petitioner, Dela Gurudal Vanjari, filed a suit in 2005 seeking a declaration that a mutation entry was illegal and for an injunction against the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Limitation Case Under Section 144C. Nagarathna J. Holds That Section 144C Does Not Extend Limitation Under Section 153 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

This separate opinion by Nagarathna J. arises from civil appeals filed by the Revenue against a common order of the Bombay High Court. The High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Considers Whether Arbitrator Has Jurisdiction to Pass Successive Awards and Whether Claims Are Barred by Res Judicata. Challenge to Awards Confirmed by Lower Court Raises Issues of Functus Officio and Splitting of Claims under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeals arose from two arbitration awards passed by the sole arbitrator in disputes between Mysore Lamp Works Limited (appellant) and S.V. Enginee...