Search Results for "Order VII Rule 11(d)"

23 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 23 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Petition in Contract Dispute - Limitation Issue for Damages Suit Held to be Mixed Question of Law and Fact - Trial Court Order Rejecting Plaint Rejection Application Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC Upheld

The petitioner company challenged termination of contract dated 26.04.2012 through writ proceedings which were dismissed -- The respondents filed suit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Civil Revision Application Challenging Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC in Suit for Declaration and Specific Performance -- Applicant Application Rejected, Anil Hariprasad Jejani's Suit to Proceed

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench dismissed Civil Revision Application No.117 of 2025 filed by Ramesh Bhagirath Rander (applicant/d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits. Court holds that plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC when the suit is not barred by limitation and the claim for mesne profits is not time-barred.

The petitioner, M/s. Ramnarain Sons Pvt Ltd, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders: (1) an order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Suit — Trial Court Erred in Rejecting Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC. Suit for Declaration of Title and Possession Not Barred by Limitation as Plaintiff Was in Possession Within 12 Years of Filing.

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for declaration of title and possession against the respondents/defendants in O.S.No.7993/2000 before the XVI Add...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Injunction Suit — Rejection of Plaint Set Aside. Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Limitation Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC.

The appellant, M/s. Shree Garodi Steels, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the respondent, M/s. Yojaka India Private Ltd., in O.S. No. 739...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal Against Confiscation Orders Under Central Excise Act and SARFAESI Act. Commissioner's Use of Omitted Rule 173Q(2) Invalid and SARFAESI Act Grants Priority to Secured Creditors Over Excise Dues.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by Punjab National Bank. The bank had extended credit fa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Gunthewari Regularization Dispute. Civil Court Jurisdiction Barred Under Section 18 of Maharashtra Gunthewari Development Act, 2001 for Challenging Regularization Order Under Section 3 of the Act.

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed Regular Civil Suit No.185 of 2015 challenging an order of regularization dated 12.12.2006 passed under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit Rejection Case — Conditional Withdrawal Without Payment of Costs Bars Fresh Suit. Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC applied to reject plaint where earlier suits were withdrawn with permission to file fresh suit but costs condition was not fulfilled.

The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed Special Civil Suit No.30 of 2007 seeking declaration that a sale deed was illegal, null and void. The respo...