Search Results for "Multi System Operator"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Multi System Operator"

26 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 26 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Constitutionality of Prohibitory Orders Under Section 144 CrPC Restricting Public Assembly. Judgment Clarifies That Reasonable Restrictions on Speech and Assembly Must Be Just, Fair and Reasonable Under Articles 19 and 21.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court initiated a suo motu criminal writ petition regarding the incident at Ramlila Maidan on 4-5 June 2011, involving the imposition of p...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeal on Taxability of Capital Gains from Transfer of Shares of a Cayman Islands Company Holding Indian Telecom Assets. The core issue involves whether the offshore transaction is liable to capital gains tax in India under the Income Tax Act, 1961, given that the company's value is derived from Indian telecom assets.

1 Aug 2026

The matter concerned a tax dispute between Vodafone International Holdings BV (VIH), a Netherlands resident company, and the Indian Revenue authoritie...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Bus Operators' Challenge to RTO Circular on Contract Carriage Permits — Circular Held Valid as Clarificatory and Not Imposing New Conditions. The court held that the impugned circular dated 19.02.2025 is merely clarificatory and does not impose any new conditions beyond those under Section 74 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

2 Jun 2025

The petitioners, an association of bus operators and individual bus operators holding contract carriage permits under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, ch...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in KVAT Act Case — Reassessment Order Set Aside for Invalid Service of Notice. Service of notice under Section 39 of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 must be on the dealer or its authorized representative; service on an unauthorized employee is invalid.

20 Feb 2025

The petitioner, Dish TV India Limited (formerly M/s ASC Enterprises Ltd.), filed a revision petition under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petitions in VAT Reassessment Cases — Reassessment Orders Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Section 39(1) of KVAT Act, 2003. Mandatory Pre-Decision Hearing Requirement Not Waived Despite Assessee's Participation in Subsequent Proceedings.

18 Feb 2025

The judgment concerns five revision petitions filed under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 (KVAT Act) against orders of the Ka...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Tender for Construction of Commercial Complex in Thane. Court holds that no public interest is involved as the petition is filed by business rivals to scuttle a tender process.

29 Jan 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the Association for Protection of Civil Rights (APCR) and three other indi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Airport Authority of India's NOC Denial for Building Construction Near Airport. Court holds that the Appellate Committee's order rejecting NOC for construction near Mumbai airport was arbitrary and unsustainable, and remits the matter for fresh consideration.

3 Jul 2020

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Kalpataru Ltd. and United Industrial House Premises Co. Soc. Ltd. (along with Klassik Homes Pvt. ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Petitions by Cable TV Operators Challenging Denial of Compounding Option and Imposition of Tax on Monthly Subscriptions. Amendments to Rule 41-G and Section 4D of Karnataka Entertainment Tax Act, 1958, Held Valid and Not Violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), or 300A of Constitution.

1 Mar 2013

The petitioners, M/s Hathway Krishna Cable (P) Limited and Hathway Cable & Datacom Pvt. Limited, are Multi System Operators (MSOs) providing cable tel...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions by Cable Operators Challenging Denial of Compounding Option Under Entertainment Tax Laws. The court upheld the amendments to Rule 41-G and Section 4D as valid and non-discriminatory, rejecting claims of violation of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 300A.

1 Mar 2013

The petitioners, M/s Hathway Krishna Cable (P) Limited and Hathway Cable & Datacom Pvt. Limited, are Multi System Operators (MSOs) providing cable tel...

Supreme Court

Presidential Reference Made to Supreme Court Seeks Advisory Opinion on Telecom Licences and Spectrum Allocation Policies. Reference Under Article 143(1) Recites Historical Grant of Licences from 1994 to 2008 Including First-Come-First-Served and Revenue Share Regimes.

12 Apr 2012

Background: The President of India made a reference under Article 143(1) of the Constitution on 12.04.2012, seeking the advisory opinion of the Suprem...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)