Search Results for "Mandatory Time Limit"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Mandatory Time Limit"

1081 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1081 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Insurance Claim Dispute — Policy Condition Precedent Not Fulfilled. Export Credit Guarantee Corporation's denial of claim upheld as appellant failed to comply with mandatory condition requiring prior approval for extending credit period beyond policy terms.

25 Jun 2026

The appellant, Prakruthi Products Pvt. Ltd., an exporter of herbal extracts, held an export credit insurance policy with the Export Credit Guarantee C...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.

13 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Rejects Plaint in Commercial Summary Suit for Non-Compliance with Pre-Institution Mediation Under Section 12-A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015. The court held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate genuine urgency to bypass mandatory pre-institution mediation, as the suit sought recovery of development management fees and security deposit without any specific instances of imminent threat.

11 Nov 2024

The plaintiff, Ekta Housing Private Limited, filed a Commercial Summary Suit against Shraddha Shelters Pvt. Ltd. and two individual guarantors for rec...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, Disqualifying Related Parties of Corporate Debtors from Submitting Resolution Plans. The Court holds that the disqualification under Section 29A(c) applies to persons acting jointly or in concert with a disqualified person, and that the provision is not retrospective in operation.

3 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment on the interpretation and validity of Section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for Corporate Assessee in Income Tax Case — Notice Issued Beyond Limitation Period and Without Valid Information. Reassessment under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 invalid as notice under Section 148A(b) was issued beyond three-year limitation period and based on information already considered in original assessment.

28 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Godrej Industries Ltd., challenged a show cause notice dated 24th May 2022 issued under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice for Lack of Jurisdiction and Limitation — Income Tax Act, 1961 Sections 147, 148, 148A, 149, 151. Reassessment notice issued beyond limitation period and without fresh information under Explanation 1 to Section 148 is invalid.

28 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Godrej Industries Ltd., challenged a show cause notice dated 24th May 2022 under Section 148A(b), an order dated 31st July 2022 under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Section 143-A of Negotiable Instruments Act Directory — Interim Compensation Requires Recording of Reasons. Court clarifies that Section 143-A is not mandatory and reasons must be recorded for quantum under Section 143-A(2).

7 Jul 2022

The judgment arises from two criminal writ petitions filed by Ashwin Ashokrao Karokar (accused) against Laxmikant Govind Joshi (complainant) under the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Assessment Order for Violation of Section 144C(11) Time Limit — DRP Directions Issued Beyond Nine-Month Period Invalid. The court held that the Dispute Resolution Panel's directions under Section 144C(5) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 must be issued within nine months from the end of the month in which the draft assessment order is received, and failure renders the assessment order void.

14 Feb 2022

The petitioner, Shell India Markets Private Limited, a company engaged in retailing petroleum products and supplying lubricants, challenged an assessm...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Transitional Input Tax Credit Under GST — Time Limit for Filing TRAN-1 Form Held Directory, Not Mandatory. The court directed the GST authorities to accept the TRAN-1 Form filed beyond the prescribed time limit, holding that the time limit was directory and the petitioner had sufficient cause for delay.

20 Mar 2020

The petitioner, Nelco Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, supplies and undertakes various network-related services. It file...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Ruling That Time Limit Under Section 14 of SARFAESI Act is Directory. The provision requiring District Magistrate to pass possession order within 30 days (extendable to 60 days) is directory, as non-compliance does not invalidate proceedings or prejudice the borrower.

1 Jan 2020

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that the time limit under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)