Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional & Town Planning Act"

478 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 478 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Challenging Ulhasnagar Development Plan, Upholds Statutory Process. Court holds that objections to draft development plan must be raised before the planning authority under MRTP Act, and belated challenges after final notification are not maintainable.

The judgment concerns two Public Interest Litigations (PILs) filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the development plan for Ulhasnagar city. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rule M-3 of DCPR for Satara Region as Ultra Vires. Rule requiring 12m wide access road for plot subdivision is a valid development control regulation under MRTP Act, 1966 and does not amount to uncompensated acquisition.

The petitioners, Suhas Shridhar Shahane and Subhash Kondiram Sawant, landowners in Satara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Sanction Variation of Town Planning Scheme. State Government's Refusal to Delete Internal Road Upheld as Valid Exercise of Discretion Under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Bombay High Court dismissing a writ petition filed by the appellant trust. The trust challenged an order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of MRTP Act Provisions. Court holds that Sections 49(7) and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 are constitutionally valid and not ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 21A, 47 and 243(w).

The petitioners, Chalisgaon Municipal Council and a resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Deletion of Name from Town Planning Scheme — Arbitrator's Order for Possession Upheld. Deletion of Petitioner's Name from Final Plot No.746/2 in Town Planning Scheme No.1, Shrirampur, Held Illegal and Arbitrary.

The petitioner, Suresh Devikisan Oza, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the deletion of his name from ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Notice Under Section 89 of MRTP Act for Lack of Jurisdiction — Prior Civil Court Decree Declaring Petitioner as Lessee and Not Trespasser Bars Corporation from Issuing Notice Under Different Act

The petitioner, M/s. Iqbal & Brothers, a partnership firm, challenged a notice dated 2nd December 1997 issued by the Pune Municipal Corporation under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Minister's Order Directing Grant of TDR in Lieu of Reservation. Landowners Entitled to Transferable Development Rights Under MRTP Act After Finalization of Town Planning Scheme.

The judgment involves two writ petitions: one by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (Corporation) challenging the order of the Minister for U...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Town Planning Dispute Over Demolition Notices. Notices Under Sections 78 and 79 of Bombay Town Planning Act Held Valid Against Alleged Unauthorized Construction.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay against the judgment of a Single Judge in First Appeal ...